Christian anarchism is a political philosophy, which connects the belief in Christianity and Anarchism. Christian anarchists belief that God (or Jesus) is the only authority and that governments or churches should not have power. An important book for the Christian anarchism is The Kingdom of God Is Within You by Leo Tolstoy.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a Turkish politician, a former mayor of Istanbul and the Prime Minister of the Republic of Turkey since 14 March 2003. He is also the chairman of the Justice and Development Party (AK Parti), which holds a majority of the seats in the Turkish Parliament.[1] John Kerry critized Erdogan for his equal enforcement of Zionism with Fascism.[2] He was also critized by the consrvative governor Rick Perry for his aggression against the jewish state Israel.[3] Erdogan said that Hamas is a "resistance group".[4] After Omar Hassan al-Bashir caused a genocide against Christians, Erdogan defended Bashir and answered: 'Muslims Don't Cause Genocide'.[5] During a visit in the Gaza Strip, Erdogan said he “hopes that his visit can contribute to the process [of establishing a Palestinian state].”[6] In 2013 Erdogan beat the secular protests against the government violently down.[7]
Erdogan is pro-life. He want to curb abortion.[8]
Conservapedia proven right
Conservapedia has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to video games, including predictions that some liberals have pathetically tried to ridicule:
Date of Conservapedia statement Conservapedia statement liberal claptrap in response Result Date of Result The Nobel Prize "selection process has become political, as it was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II or to anyone who criticizes the theory of evolution. The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken liberals, such as Jimmy Carter."[1] Liberal denial insists that the Nobel Prize has integrity, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Subsequently the Nobel Peace Prize was absurdly awarded to Barack Obama despite a lack of any beneficial, meaningful achievement, and even Obama supporters reacted with "shock" and "a belief that the award was premature, a disservice and a potential liability."[2] Explained that abortion increases the risk of breast cancer.[3] Strident, hysterical denials by liberals, who oppose even telling women of the possibility of an increase in risk. A new study shows that the "number of young women being diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer has been slowly but steadily rising over the past 3 decades," beginning a few years after Roe v. Wade.[4] O'Reilly endorses the liberals' amnesty bill for illegal immigration. The ratings of Fox News drops to a 12-year low, doing particularly poorly among the 25-54 age group. "So it turns out the speed of light might not be constant after all." [9] Because Jon Stewart's movies "almost always do very badly (critically and financially) people say that there is a 'Jon Stewart Curse' that he brings to all his movies."[10] The 2008 Oscars, which he hosted, set the modern record for fewest viewers, and except for one very minor part as himself Stewart has not appeared in a movie since Conservapedia's observation in 2007. Liberals tout a supposed "gay penguin" in a California zoo.[12] Liberals rabidly deny someone can be an ex-homosexual. Ex-homosexual is faced with a $10,000 fine, spends $7,000 in legal fees, and is forced to go to pro-homosexuality classes by a liberal judge who claimed he engaged in a aggressive behavior in a discussion with homosexual man (during his discussion the ex-homosexual man was holding a baby).[13] In 2009, the alleged gay penguin in a California zoo starts a romance with lady penguin and abandons his supposed male penguin lover. The homosexual activist Wayne Besen claims the penguin is living in denial and not an ex-homosexual male penguin. (see: Homosexuality in animals myth).[14] Conservapedia observes that Shaken Baby Syndrome is a doubtful theory by governmental child protective services, which has resulted in dubious convictions.[15] The governmental "experts" must be right and Conservapedia must somehow be wrong. Conservapedia warns against the HPV vaccine, observing that it was not tested for possibly causing infertility.[17] How can government and the big pharmaceutical industry be wrong??? The British Medical Journal reports on a case study of a severe condition of infertility in a 16-year-old girl subsequent to taking the HPV vaccine.[18] Prominent African American physician Benjamin Carson observes, "The bullies are ... especially the media who like to just beat on anybody who doesn't toe the line ... they suppress freedom of speech."[20] Observed that Barack Obama is likely Muslim and could become the first Muslim President.[21] While liberals would denounce the religion of Obama's future rival, Mitt Romney, they insist that Obama's religion cannot be questioned. Beginning in March of 2008, Conservapedia begins chronicling higher education moral corruption via its Professor values article.[22] Starting in 2010, Conservapedia repeatedly warns students about picking their college majors on its main page. See: Worst college majors Conservapedia also cites Gerald Celente about future protests in Europe/Europe and cites Celente concerning useless college majors which needlessly rack up debts in young people. Conservapedia warns about a future "higher educational bubble".[23] Liberal colleges and liberal press do not give enough attention to the issue of picking a college major. Nor does the liberal press sufficiently warn about future protests. Liberal press does not give adequate coverage to the issue of higher education moral corruption. Liberal press and liberal academia do not sufficiently warn about the poor education universities and colleges are often providing. January 18, 2011. It is reported that a study shows that a very large percentage of college students are not developing higher thinking skills.[24] The trend of liberal colleges closing their doors continues.[25][26]Occupy Wall Street and other Occupy protests happen in the United States and in Europe in 2011 and young people are very prevalent in the protests. Some protests turn violent and engage in property destruction. In November of 2011, the Daily Mail reports concerning the Occupy Wall Street movement and the trash/garbage associated with it: "If this is the product of our liberal arts colleges, why continue their tax exemptions and tax support? Universities are supposed to produce intelligent people who will make a positive contribution to society. Not these pigs".[27] In 2011, it is reported that Occupy movements are littering the streets.[28]
Young Occupy Wall Street protesters are caught on film mindlessly doing a pro-bestiality chant (see: Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant).
The Occupy movements of 2011 are still prevalent in the world and the unemployment levels of young people remain high. "The science is settled" that rapid global warming is somehow occurring, despite much evidence to the contrary. In 2011, frigid temperatures, October blizzards, and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "climate change"; in 2011 and 2013, even the liberal media admit there has been no atmospheric warming since 1998. Conservapedia indicates that Ben Bernanke's investment portfolio dropped in value in 2008.[31] In addition, Conservapedia declares, "Given the abysmal economic policy of Bernanke and the Obama administration, Bernanke probably should invest in gold."[32] During the period of 2010-2011, Conservapedia cited the investor Jim Rogers who repeatedly suggests that people invest in commodites.[33][34] Liberals call Conservapedians "gold bugs" As of November 2011, the price of gold has gone up dramatically. The price has gone from about $950 an ounce to about $1,700 an ounce.[35]Price of gold continues to have an overall upward trend. In August of 2011, the Financial Times has an article entitled "Gold remains world's most powerful trend".[36] The Wall Street Journal reports in 2011 that "Companies Stock Up as Commodities Prices Rise".[37] In November of 2011, Unilever warns about rising commodity prices.[38]
Conservapedia mentions that some Americans are turning to self-employment during the economic downturn as jobs are difficult to come by. In addition, Conservapedia mentions developing multiple streams of income in case the economy goes into a depression and many people lose their jobs. Conservapedia also gives resources and suggestions for low cost businesses.[39] The liberal "graduate student at a sociology department somewhere in the United States" at the Total Drek blog seems to shiver in horror at the hard work involved. In addition, he appears to want people to have a defeatist cry in their beer attitude instead of having a proactive and creative can do attitude.[40] In 2011, Conservapedia indicates that a sociology major is one of the worst college majors to have. Barack Obama's "stimulus" package fails. Many Americans lose their jobs and have their unemployment benefits run out. In 2011, Fox News reports that most unemployed no longer receive unemployment benefits.[41] Homelessness increases and "Obamavilles" spring up.[42] Unemployment in the United States and many other countries remains high.[43][44] In 2011, Cafe Press is selling unemployed sociology major bumper stickers.[45] World economy continues to skate on thin ice and the Eurozone is experiencing significant economic problems. Conservapedia identifies the significance of an effort to recall Menendez from office.[46] Liberals stood by Menendez for years. Some mistakenly viewed Santorum as the only other option besides Romney, at the expense of Newt Gingrich After taking votes away from Gingrich, Santorum surprised many by dropping out of the race, practically giving the victory to Romney; Santorum then endorsed Romney-like Jon Bruning instead of the conservative Don Stenberg for U.S. Senate in Nebraska, and then endorsed Romney in a late-night email.[49] Repeated attempts to remove the insight from the entry. A Stanford University geneticist confirms that intelligence has been declining for thousands of years.[51] Liberal denial shouts down any observation of the correlation between atheism and underachievement. "England's performance at South Africa 2010 was officially their worst at a World Cup finals, according to Fifa."[53] In an open letter to a leader of a new revision to the NIV Bible, Conservapedia expressed "concern that your Committee might produce a liberal translation that distorts and conceals references to the unborn child in appeasement of the pro-abortion position."[54] Atheist men scoff at the article. In July of 2011, the Elevatorgate scandal occurs. A woman in the Skepchick community says "I look forward to watching your legacy crash and burn."[57] [58] A top actress -- Katie Holmes, the wife of Tom Cruise -- is observed having gray hairs at only age 33. The lamestream media continued to promote Palin as a leading contender for more than six months. Palin announced she will not be a candidate for the nomination and has lost political influence. [61] Chris Christie made a special endorsement of Mitt Romney for president Large earthquakes are increasing in frequency.[65] "A remarkable increase in the rate of (magnitude 3) and greater earthquakes is currently in progress," according to a presentation at the Seismological Society of America.[66]On May 24, 3013, the second massive earthquake in 2013 (magnitude 8 and above) occurred, which is more than the total annual amount in each of the past 5 years.[67]
April 17, 2012 and May 24, 2013 Conservapedia claimed that Pacific Institute was not a non-partisan environmental group but deceitful liberals promoting lies.[68] Pretend that Peter Gleick and other environmentalists don't utilize bad science or push political agendas Pacific Institute's president Peter Gleick promoted bad science and pushed a biased liberal political agenda by admitting to fraud in 2012. [69] An unspeakable slaughter of 20 elementary school children occurred in Newtown, Connecticut by a 20-year-old player of violent video games, followed by a mass burning of violent games weeks later. Conservapedia declared Rick Santorum the winner of the Iowa Caucuses before all the results were in, and despite polling suggesting he would only attain third place Eventually the lamestream media admitted that Rick Santorum was the winner Conservapedia declared Rick Santorum the winner of the Colorado primary relatively early in the evening, long before all the results were in, and despite Romney later surpassing Santorum during part of the night Liberals delayed for hours before admitting that Santorum would win. Eventually the lamestream media admitted that Rick Santorum was the winner "Disney movies, which have churned out liberal claptrap for more than a decade, strike out again on opening night for Disney's lame John Carter. The last Disney movie to qualify for Greatest Conservative Movies was its brilliant Beauty and the Beast (1991)." Liberals don't criticize Disney as long it continues to promote feminism and other liberal drivel. The Disney film unit chairman "resigned following the company’s $200 million loss on the science-fiction picture 'John Carter,' possibly the biggest ever for a single movie." Liberals insist that Manning will be better for Broncos, and pretend that politics had nothing to do with this surprise replacement. To the amazement of liberals, Manning throws 2 key interceptions that enable the underdog Ravens to humiliate the Broncos in Denver in their first playoff game. Liberals desperately tried to find a role for Beckham, eventually having him play the absurd part of conveying the torch by speedboat to the Olympic Stadium while the final part of the ceremony was in progress. To the amazement of liberals, Beckham was not even selected for the British Olympic soccer team, even though other players over the age of 23 were selected. Subsequently, the media promoted Beckham as the likely final torchbearer, which was instead given to the best of the public (five unknown but rising young athletes). Liberal denial continued about Armstrong, insisting that he be removed from this entry because Armstrong continued to deny the obvious;[75] the liberal Olympic bureaucrats refused for months to strip Armstrong of his medal, until after Armstrong admitted his doping. Finally and pathetically Armstrong admitted what he had so aggressively denied about doping. Conservapedia repeatedly predicted that liberals would not allow one of the Greatest Conservative Sports Stars, Tim Tebow, to have any real playing time on the New York Jets, and that it would pathetically fail without Tebow. Liberals insisted Tebow would play if the other QB failed, or that Tebow was not good enough to play, despite how he led the underachieving Broncos to a playoff victory against the highly ranked Steelers. The New York Jets failed miserably while never giving Tebow any real playing time, and the Jets were eliminated from playoff contention even before the last week of the season. [76] Conservapedia observed that the L.A. Lakers had packed their starting line-up with Overrated Sports Stars, and then hired their preferred coach despite how a better one was available.[77] Liberals thought these players and the hiring of the new coach were good because the media told them so. The L.A. Lakers barely made the playoffs, and then were routed by record-setting margins in the first round. Conservapedia observed that extended 35-minute blackout at the Super Bowl was likely caused in part by the energy rationing mindset of liberals.[78] It was not a faulty relay - relays almost never fail in such a manner, as confirmed by an expert quoted by National Geographic. "The liberal media go along with the communist cover-up about Hugo Chavez, despite how he likely died in a Cuban hospital in December."[79] Repeated insistence that reports in the lamestream media that Chavez was alive from December to March, including even a photo purporting to be him, must be true. Hugo Chavez is indeed dead, but the BBC claims he died nearly two months after Conservapedia had already informed the world of that fact.[80] It is reported that Chavez's decomposition is too advanced for embalming. Proving he died much earlier than reported. [81] "Tamerlan Tsarnaev probably murdered his friend on a 9/11 anniversary, and DNA likely proves it."[82] Even though the DNA match is quick and known to the Obama Administration, even though there will be no trial of Tamerlan, and even though closure on the 9/11-anniversary murders would comfort families of the victims, liberals want the DNA match to continue to be withheld from the families and the public. More than two weeks later, stories begin to appear in the lamestream media that forensic evidence and cell phone records confirm the likely involvement of Tamerlan Tsarnaev in committing the gruesome murders. ? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&oldid=7393? http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/09/a_weighty_prize.html? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&oldid=14427? http://abcnews.go.com/Health/advanced-breast-cancer-rise-younger-women/story?id=18606955? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_O%27Reilly&oldid=37999? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sean_Hannity&oldid=64126? http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/01/fox-news-ratings-hit-year-low-155638.html? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Quantifying_Openmindedness&oldid=147388? http://www.catholic.org/technology/story.php?id=50261? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jon_Stewart&oldid=271190? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexuality_in_animals_myth&oldid=308759? http://americansfortruth.com/2009/07/15/gay-penguin-flies-straight/? http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56702? http://americansfortruth.com/2009/07/15/gay-penguin-flies-straight/? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Shaken_Baby_Syndrome&oldid=367617? http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/04/shaken-baby-case-an-update/#.T4DftOjeRkI.email? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=HPV_vaccine&oldid=395596? http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2012/bcr-2012-006879.abstract? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&oldid=430832? http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/03/09/dr-carson-media-bullies-suppress-freedom-speech-beat-anyone-who-doesn#ixzz2N5XWfVMc? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&oldid=530340? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Professor_values&oldid=412536? http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/archive91? http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/01/18/106949/study-many-college-students-not.html? http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/07/09/baldwin? http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/5312/losing_liberal_arts/? http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/46288? http://www.freestaterevolution.com/?p=1967? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100095506/there-has-been-no-global-warming-since-1998/? http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/August_2009? http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/August_2009? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=0&search=%22Jim+rogers%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1? Jim Rogers : Missing out on Commodities?? http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au1825nyb.html? Gold remains world's most powerful trend? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704775604576120533736097682.html? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/unilever-warns-about-rising-commodity-prices-6256894.html? http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/September_2009? Conservapedia: For laughs or facepalms - Tuesday, September 08, 2009? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/05/most-us-unemployed-no-longer-receive-benefits/? http://www.thebradentontimes.com/news/2011/11/09/community/national_hunger_and_homelessness_awareness_week_puts_spotlight_on_increasing_need/? http://www.bls.gov/fls/intl_unemployment_rates_monthly.htm? http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics? http://www.cafepress.com/+unemployed_sociology_major_bumper_sticker,25387924? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Menendez&oldid=744786? http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/09/opinion/mr-menendezs-ethics-problem.html?hp&_r=0? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=762021? http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/santorum-underwhelming-endorsement-romney-081055500.html? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=770704? http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/nov/12/pampered-humanity-less-intelligent? http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/June_2010? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8814195.stm? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Letter_to_Douglas_Moo&oldid=791512? http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/ (announcing availability of online version)? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Women%27s_views_of_Richard_Dawkins&oldid=803578? Skepchick woman? http://skepchick.org/2011/07/dear-richard-dawkins/? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=822877? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=852880? http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/105741/? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Question_evolution!_campaign&oldid=904849? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Grinding_up_American_atheism_into_a_fine_pulp&oldid=936440? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_Presidential_Race_-_Endorsements_for_Republicans_2012&oldid=944456? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=909160? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/17/us-earthquakes-usa-idUSBRE83G1FL20120417? http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0525/Russia-8.2-earthquake-is-big-but-no-deaths? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pacific_Institute&oldid=933383? Climate scientist admits stealing docs from conservative think tank, Fox News, February 21, 2012? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&oldid=941531? http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/santorum-now-the-iowa-winner-officially-111713.html? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&oldid=989247? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&oldid=989076? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&oldid=1004539? [1]? http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/sports/index.ssf/2012/12/new_york_jets_eliminated_from.html? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&oldid=1019273? http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=1055150&oldid=1032962? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1028225? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21679053? Venezuela may be unable to embalm Chavez's remains? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=1048618User talk:Aschlafly
Comment here
Hi! Thank for for creating this website.
Archive Index
if (window.showTocToggle) { var tocShowText = "show"; var tocHideText = "hide"; showTocToggle(); }I was a little bit disappointed that Pentecost didn't make the Main Page, even after I had mentioned it: see Talk:Main_Page#Pentecost....
I'd like to see the Christian Feasts being honored on the Main Page, be it by a masterpiece, a link to an article, etc.: the next will be Trinity Sunday. Any ideas?
Thanks, --AugustO 08:42, 21 May 2013 (EDT)
Good suggestions. Often this will depend on what else is in the news, or what other entries editors are spending their time on at a particularly moment. Other websites on the internet are purely religious sites.--Andy Schlafly 10:48, 21 May 2013 (EDT)Mr. Schlafly,
I wanted to apologize if my past edit offended you or damaged the project. It was never my intent to remove information from the table, but only to enhance the layout and supplement the content through additional citations. I have also apologized on the talk page of the article, but I thought I owed you a direct apology as well.
Additionally, I still have a desire to improve the article. I have posted a proposed plan on the talk page, and I would be very grateful for your input. I eagerly await your suggestions.
Sincerely, WilliamWB 11:27, 23 May 2013 (EDT)
Andrew Schlafly, you claimed that „Jesus prayed, often publicly, for people”. I'm still interested in an example for this - as you said that this happened often, you should be able to provide us with one. To be more precise: I don't want examples of Jesus blessing or giving thanks ( e?????? - like in Matthew 14:19) or laying hands upon someone (?p?t???µ? ?e??a? - like in Matthew 19:15), I'd like to see an example of Jesus praying (p??se???µa?) publicly for people.
Could you please give us a verse? Thank you. --AugustO 15:40, 24 May 2013 (EDT)
For example, Jesus routinely prayed in public before each meal.--Andy Schlafly 21:32, 24 May 2013 (EDT) „I don't want examples of Jesus blessing or giving thanks” „I'd like to see an example of Jesus praying (p??se???µa?) publicly for people” „Could you please give us a verse?” As you can see, your answer doesn't match the question. --AugustO 22:45, 24 May 2013 (EDT) Try John 8-14 (Translated)#11:41 - when Jesus very publicly prays to and thanks God prior to raising Lazarus from the dead.--Andy Schlafly 23:45, 24 May 2013 (EDT) I wonder if he'd be satisfied with John 17:11-17: Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one. 12 While I was with them, I kept them in your name, which you have given me. I have guarded them, and not one of them has been lost except the son of destruction, that the Scripture might be fulfilled. 13 But now I am coming to you, and these things I speak in the world, that they may have my joy fulfilled in themselves. 14 I have given them your word, and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. 15 I do not ask that you take them out of the world, but that you keep them from the evil one. 16 They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. 17 Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth. [1] Perhaps there aren't as many transcripts of our Lord's specific prayers as we'd all like. --Ed Poor Talk 19:46, 26 May 2013 (EDT)I may be a "liberal" Christian but I am devout, but some articles (guess by who?) suggest I am more associated with Satan them I am Jesus. I will not stand for it any longer--Patmac 09:34, 26 May 2013 (EDT)
Dear Mr. Schlafly,
Can you please unprotect this page? I would like to update it with information about VY and Shock's chatroom that has come to light at Talk:Main Page. If this is not desirable, then I would suggest unprotecting the page (which is currently sourced only to a single page on an anonymous blog) so that a more verifiable article can be written in its place (and perhaps if I can get a hold of Conservative, he can point me to reliable sources). Thanks, GregG 21:28, 31 May 2013 (EDT)
Can you do anything with this: Template:Dead link? --JoeyJ 14:02, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
What is wrong with it?--Andy Schlafly 16:20, 1 June 2013 (EDT) Maybe you can expand it. In Wikipedia there is a category for articles with dead links --JoeyJ 09:00, 2 June 2013 (EDT) I've done it. If Mr. Schlafly or someone else wants to change the exact name of the category, they can go ahead. Onward 09:25, 2 June 2013 (EDT)Could you restore my talk page, actually? A nice little memento from the hoopla. :) Onward 20:24, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
Conservative still goes on with his hatred, I will get blocked for this but here is my promise, I will wait 3 days and if after that time this users hatred is not completely removed from this site I am going to report Conservapedia to the Southern Poverty Law Center and request it is designated a hate group.--Patmac 11:28, 3 June 2013 (EDT)
I would have preferred to send these messages to you in person but I cannot find an email for you so it has to be done here, I have requested you do something before but have been constantly ignored. Lets face it Andy, despite not holding office you are very much a politician, and what does a politician do when a subordinate constantly jeopardizes his position? He gits rid.--Patmac 11:41, 3 June 2013 (EDT) Conservapedia supports and defends the full right to free speech, and urges liberal groups to do likewise.--Andy Schlafly 12:16, 3 June 2013 (EDT)This is not free speech, this is hate speech. When i read that Jesus eats and spits out moderate Christians that is hate speech, and it also brings the name of our saviour into disrepute. He does not just attack evolutionists and atheists, he attacks Christians, to the extent that we are not Christians at all. "Liberal" Christianity and marital infidelity, "Liberal" Christianity and whore mongering, "Liberal" Christianity and bestiality, need i say more? But if someone dare challenge his position, he blocks them, how is that free speech? I think you personally have some pretty strange ideas but you do allow them to be challenged without going on a hate spree, and you are to be respected for that. But constantly allowing Conservative to post his vile tirade, however free it may be, just undermines Conservatives and by extension your image.--Patmac 12:32, 3 June 2013 (EDT)
This user Pacmac is blocked indefinitely. Apparently, he thinks he can define what hatred is, even so far as to saying that the above reference concerning Jesus constitutes "hate speech". This is the place in the Bible where it comes from, Revelation, Chapter 2: 14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. 17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. What it means is that this user is trying his best to stop any mention of the Bible unless this mention is done in accordance with his liberal philosophy; which means that the above Revelation verses are null and void. He further threatens to call the SPLC on us if we don't behave in according to his whims, i.e. one hate filled individual calling a hate-filled organization to complain about our alleged hate against his own hate-filled ideas. Patmac had also forgotten about our First Amendment RIGHTS to FREE SPEECH, FREEDOM OF RELIGION, and FREEDOM TO ASSEMBLE. He's so filled with hate himself that he would demand the SPLC to try to stop us from enjoying those rights. As far as I'm concerned, he failed. And he can continue failing somewhere else. Karajou 13:12, 3 June 2013 (EDT) Firstly, let me say that I do not endorse user:Patmac`s tactics of legal threats. They have no place on a wiki, and should instead be sent to the site's owner (Mr. Schlafly) by email. However, as per hate speech and the Bible, it is clear that the Bible condemns churches who do not uphold the tenets of Christianity, but on the other hand, who is User:C to decide which churches are not upholding these tenets? brenden 13:43, 3 June 2013 (EDT)This is an opportunity for Andy to show some leadership in setting a path that de-escallates the conflict here. On the one hand, Patmac is absolutely right about the intemperate nature of User:C's comments. On the other hand, Patmac's frustration with the failure to address that problem led him to make intemperate remarks as well. I suggest that we forgive Patmac for his transgression, and address whether User:C's edits are consistent with the fundamental commandments of Conservapedia. This is not a "Free Speech" issue. User:C is free to express his views on his private blog. Our question is whether CP should endorse and republish some sharp comments as the views of the entire project. Wschact 07:22, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
ReymeDneK's contributions? Thanks, GregG 10:15, 5 June 2013 (EDT)
There is a dispute between myself and user:Markman regarding User:Rafael's block. Could you please provide some guidance? Thanks, brenden 15:34, 6 June 2013 (EDT)
See this edit. Clear case of incivility. Considering his previous record I'd say he should be banned for at least a week if not more. I would have given him a lifetime ban but unfortunately there are too many editors with blocking rights who seem to be determined to subvert Conservapedia's rules. Interestingly enough, many of those editors are also in cordial relations with the RW userbase. - Markman 15:42, 6 June 2013 (EDT) You should also point out that, aside from you, the only other person who has given Rafael a block, was DamianJohn, and a now outed parodist. As per "determined to subvert Conservapedia's rules", I would suggest that you re-read the rules. I still haven't forgotten your bullying of AlanE. brenden 15:48, 6 June 2013 (EDT) "You should also point out that, aside from you, the only other person who has given Rafael a block, was DamianJohn, and a now outed parodist." Come on darling, don't be afraid to call the parodist by his name - Dvergne. The same Dvergne who sided with you and with AlanE against me. So you're basically admitting to both associating with a liberal website and with parodists. - Markman 15:54, 6 June 2013 (EDT) As far as I understand, User:Dvergne, Karajou, and myself were chastising you for spamming {{uncited}} specifically on AlanE's contributions. Are you insinuating that Karajou is "associating with a parodist"?? Furthermore, once again, you have shown yourself unwilling to read that userpage, that explains my goals on that website specifically. In case you can't see that website, I have the words reproduced below:==Wat?== *Why are you here? :I'd rather not be impersonated, and I would like a word in this place. *What are you doing at Conservapedia? :I do enjoy thought exercises. While Conservapedia does go in a little overboard at times, I still have faith in it. I feel that the only reason that Conservapedia's problems are so famous, are because of the inordinate amount of trolls and parodists, trying their best to write something so ridiculous, that their comrades might congratulate them. That, and the continued threats by [[user:naca|certain]] [[user:Umichcynic|people]] [[user:Proxima Centauri|at]] [[Liberapedia|certain websites]], to (blocked by spam filter), and harrass the precarious community at Conservapedia, have not helped the situation. One of my goals there is to rectify that. brenden 16:00, 6 June 2013 (EDT)
Your other edits on that website reveal a different story. Your cordial relations with the RW userbase shows that you're one of them. - Markman 16:04, 6 June 2013 (EDT) In the days of TK your admiting you are even reading that site would have earnt you a ban. Davidspencer 16:05, 6 June 2013 (EDT) On the contrary, I have been called a dick, a parodist, a "smarmy little prefect", among other things. I do my best to present Conservapedia in a positive light, and frankly, are doing a lot more good than Markman, going there to deliberately spread a false impression of a surly, confrontational Conservapedia. brenden 16:06, 6 June 2013 (EDT) I think that I made my case and I don't need to elaborate any further. I don't only enforce the 90/10 rule but also try to comply with it, so I'll refrain from any further replies until Mr. Schlafly says his word. - Markman 16:09, 6 June 2013 (EDT) I think that you shouldn't jump the gun, and instead, should wait for Mr. Schlafly's word on this matter. brenden 16:05, 7 June 2013 (EDT)A sock of Mr. Mason has recently posted some vile attacks on that page. Although I have undid them, someone may want to block that sock and/or take other remedial measures. Thanks, WilliamWB 12:43, 7 June 2013 (EDT)
I wouldn't worry about this. Karajou took a minute or two to learn oversighting. Mr. Mason will now become even more obscure than he already is and rightfully so. Conservative 00:12, 11 June 2013 (EDT)Dear Mr. Schlafly,
I know you've taken interest in voter ID just as I have, and I found out this week that the Arkansas Secretary of State has proposed rules to implement Arkansas' new voter ID law. [2]. I'm planning on writing up and submitting comments to fix several issues with the rules, and I was wondering whether you were planning on submitting comments or wanted to see what I am writing. Hopefully, if the rules are fixed as I suggest, the voter ID law should survive federal and state court challenges. Thanks, GregG 13:24, 8 June 2013 (EDT)
That's interesting. I wasn't planning on submitting any comments, but I'd be curious to see what you submit. My own view is that voter ID laws are not as significant as early voting laws.--Andy Schlafly 22:36, 8 June 2013 (EDT)Andy, I think if Conservapedians could spend more time creating content rather than fighting spammers that they would do so if given the opportunity.
Why don't you add the feature to the wiki that fights spammers that Brenden says works great at his wiki?
Here is the informmation:
I noticed that in the RC, there's been a large amount of spammers. Perhaps implementing QuestyCaptcha, a system that uses questions that Mr. Schlafly chooses, could stem the onslaught. It works excellently at my wiki. Here is the information for this extention: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:QuestyCaptcha brenden 21:10, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
I hope this helps. Conservative 10:30, 9 June 2013 (EDT)
Dear Mr. Schlafly,
User:Conservative reverted my recent edits without explanation and protected the page. Since there is no way to contact U:C and I don't see it likely that there will be fruitful discussion about improving the article about the logical fallacy of quote mining, I would request that the page be unprotected and that U:C work in collegiality with me to improve the page. Thanks, GregG 11:21, 9 June 2013 (EDT)
There is nothing wrong about quoting the other side and using those quotes to disprove and discredit their position. Some evolutionists pretend there is something wrong with this, yet politicians, attorneys, and any debater properly does this frequently.--Andy Schlafly 13:00, 9 June 2013 (EDT) I'm glad you are offering your input, and I should probably explain my changes fully on the talk page. Science, law, theology, politics, mathematics, and philosophy are all different systems for answering questions about our world. Each system has its own rules, so what may be a valid argument in law (citing to binding precedent or quoting an authority) is not necessarily valid in science or math. Likewise, logical deduction from axioms is the main way mathematical results are proven, but it has less utility in the other systems of answering questions. In any event, I think there should be a full discussion on the talk page, and, revisiting this issue, I think that what would probably be best (and what I will therefore request) is for the page protection to automatically expire, say, a week or two from now, and hopefully, the discussion that takes place during this next week will improve the article. Thanks, GregG 13:10, 9 June 2013 (EDT) EDIT You wrote "politicians, attorneys, and any debater properly does [sic] this frequently." I trust you are familiar with Rule 3.3 of the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. GregG 13:23, 9 June 2013 (EDT)Try this:
$wgGroupPermissions['*' ]['createpage'] = false; $wgGroupPermissions['user' ]['createpage'] = false; $wgGroupPermissions['autoconfirmed']['createpage'] = true; $wgAutoConfirmAge = 600 ; # Ten Minutes
I disagree with this proposal. I think one of the things that makes wikis so successful is that people can jump in by creating an account and instantly contribute by improving pages. To be honest, I think that there are enough blockers to handle the spam efficiently, but if there needs to be a solution, I would recommend QuestyCaptcha. GregG 17:03, 9 June 2013 (EDT)It keeps on coming up everytime I add a link to references, is there any way that you can turn it off for my user? I clearly am not a bot or spammer so if you can it would be much appreciated. JAnderson 20:51, 10 June 2013 (EDT)
Thanks for asking. I've added SkipCatcha privileges to your account.--Andy Schlafly 21:19, 10 June 2013 (EDT)I'm happy to announce that the Book of Malachi is now fully translated. I would like you to take a look at it and if needed help improve it. Note: not all of the book's translation was done by me, but in the parts that I did translate I changed "LORD of hosts" into "LORD of armies". The Hebrew word "tsvaot" (?????) that is sometimes translated into "hosts" actually means "armies". I think that this translation is more accurate, plus it sends a strong anti-pacifist message.
I also see that I can't add Malachi to the list of fully translated books in Template:ConservativeBible. Could you please do that for me? - Markman 06:16, 15 June 2013 (EDT)
Fabulous! I like your correction of the pacifist bias. I've updated the template. Well done!--Andy Schlafly 11:41, 15 June 2013 (EDT) Thanks you for your kind words! - Markman 11:41, 15 June 2013 (EDT) I look forward to more of your translations.--Andy Schlafly 11:48, 15 June 2013 (EDT)Schlafly, could you please answer to my post on Talk:Roman Catholic Church about the RCC and evolution? Thanks, cheers. --Swordsman 08:10, 15 June 2013 (EDT)
Replied.--Andy Schlafly 11:48, 15 June 2013 (EDT)Hi can you please uploud these pictures: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anarchy-symbol.svg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ancapflag.svg Thanks --JoeyJ 13:49, 16 June 2013 (EDT)
Done as requested.--Andy Schlafly 14:28, 16 June 2013 (EDT) Thank you but I cant put them into the articles Anarchism and Anarcho-capitalism Can you help me, please? --JoeyJ 13:58, 18 June 2013 (EDT) I resized them from 500px to 200px and now you can use them in a format smaller than 500px. See: Anarchism and http://conservapedia.com/File:200px-Ancapflag.svg.png Conservative 14:35, 18 June 2013 (EDT) Thanks Conservative. Please uploud yet this here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anarchist_flag.svg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_punk.svg --JoeyJ 08:47, 21 June 2013 (EDT)Mr Schlafly, Having visited the Eagle Forum website I noticed you run courses on US history which interests me, but have noticed the registration is restricted to those living in the USA. Is it possible to enrole from elsewhere?--Tomqua 16:27, 18 June 2013 (EDT)
Consider using the U.S. History course I posted here: Conservapedia:Index.--Andy Schlafly 16:41, 18 June 2013 (EDT)Thank you--Tomqua 16:42, 18 June 2013 (EDT)
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-207_162-57590166/james-gandolfini-dead-at-51/
It's the same old story over and over: a Hollywood liberal (he helped raise money for Kerry) engages in a self destructive lifestyle (compulsive eating in this case) leading to his own demise. So tragic and yet so preventable. - Markman 15:08, 20 June 2013 (EDT)
Exodus 34-40 (Translated)
Conservative Bible Project