Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Template:Mainpageright

Belgium university study indicates that conservative senior citizen voters have higher confidence levels than liberals.[1]

Atheist wiki editor admits that the evolutionary paradigm is disputable. Other atheist wiki editors don't challenge his assertion.[2]

A new astronomical fix for the Great Flood. [3]

America's allies are furious that Obama was snooping and spying on them, and Obama fails to explain why he did this to our friends. [4] Instead, Obama has Joe Biden focus on preventing Obama's young nemesis from traveling to Ecuador.

America's first monument to atheism is unsightly and appears to be crooked. [5] Once again, the notion that atheists are more intelligent is dispelled and the notion that atheists are crooked is reinforced. See: Atheism and intelligence and Atheism and morality

Joe Biden personally begs Ecuador not to grant asylum to Edward J. Snowden, but Ecuador is unimpressed. [6]

The Discovery Institute charges evolutionist Nick Matzke with a suspiciously fast and sloppy review of Stephen C. Meyer's book Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design.[7]

Setback for creation-deniers: Jane Austen is favored to replace Charles Darwin on Brits' £10 note! [8]

Jane Austen was a creationist and her father served as an Anglican rector.

The economies of the U.S., Germany and France have all recovered the output lost since the 2008 economic crisis. But Britain so far hasn't bounced back.[9]

Liberal double standard: liberal media are fine with the use of rubber bullets and even a stun grenade against people who were protesting Obama. [10] Imagine the outrage if a conservative government did that.

A Tea Party Democrat warns: don't let the IRS scandal die. [11]

Another win: Court of Appeals rules for Hobby Lobby in its challenge to an ObamaCare regulation. [12]

Christians are happier than atheists on Twitter.[13]

Despite a brutal homicide, NFL owners refuse to clean up the league: the underachieving Dallas Cowboys keep a jailed player on its team who has been charged with intoxication manslaughter and failing two drug tests. [14]

Don't let talking heads entertain you out of your freedoms. [15]

Nothing in the U.S. Supreme Court rulings on homosexual "marriage" affects Christian freedoms regarding the ability to follow Scripture or clearly teach the biblical view of marriage.[16]

Theologically conservative clergy can still preach that individuals who die homosexuals will burn in hell for all eternity.

The battle of the black robes will begin: judiciary against clergy. Where do you stand? [17]

The Hollywood left: so anti-gun in public, until the director yells "ACTION!" [18]

Star player in the anti-Christian NFL is now suspected of having murdered two others a month before he received a $40 million contract extension. [19]

The Supreme Court grants cert to reconsider a pro-abortion ruling by a state court, which is the first time in more than six years that the High Court takes an abortion case. The lamestream media, obsessed with the gay marriage issue, hasn't even noticed this cert grant yet.

That Supreme Court decision on gay marriage is only one symptom of a culture run amuck. See here for a full list. [20]

NFL values: a Pro-Bowl "star" with a $41 million contract is arrested for allegedly orchestrating a murder that included shooting the victim five times at point-blank range, while accompanied by friends. [21] Perhaps the NFL should welcome Christianity rather than shunning it.

More than 2/3rds of the United States continues to reject same-sex marriage, and judicial supremacy by the Supreme Court today does not change that one bit.

Supreme Court decision on gay marriage blasted by National Organization for Marriage leader. [22] And by Bradlee Dean: [23]

The immigration bill is a big pork fest, and now is an embarrassment to its chief sponsors on that account. [24] And: a Tea Party activist has a few choice words for New Jersey's appointed Senator, and the Republican Party in general. [25]

The liberal media admit: "President Obama in the doldrums." [26] If he cannot even control his own NSA, then why would anyone believe he can control the climate?

Bradlee Dean warns again: as ye sow, so shall ye reap. And that includes what your government sows for you. [27]

Obama is more like a dictator than Vladimir Putin, as Putin observes: "Assange and Snowden consider themselves human rights activists and say they are fighting for the spread of information. Ask yourself this: should you hand these people over so they will be put in prison?" [28]

Russia to Obama and John Kerry: stop lying about Russia's role concerning Edward J. Snowden. Vladimir Putin said Russia wouldn't extradite him anyway. [29]

A former Senate candidate offers his alternative immigration reform plan. [30]

Reddit is seeing its web traffic plunge in 2013. The year 2013 is the WORST year in the history of atheism/Darwinism just like Question evolution! campaign fans predicted![31]

Salon publishes an article which declares: Christopher "Hitchens’ “God Is Not Great” is an intellectually shameful book". Why are atheists so low-class and so low brow?[32]

Liberal John Kerry says that Russia should hand over Obama's nemesis to the Obama Administration. [33] And he's only one example of liberal hypocrites who now talk about "rule of law" after standing for its opposite – during a previous administration. [34]

A grassroots activist asks sobering questions about Edward J. Snowden and his motives, in light of unproven allegations about acts beyond revealing to the public that the American government spies on its own citizens. [35]

Switzerland, a beacon of European creationism, has the world's most competitive economy. The United States, a land filled with creationists, is expected to dominate the world economy for years. [36]

Christianity has great depth and sophistication. Also, 7 reasons why atheism has developed a reputation of being low-class and "low brow". [37]

Reuters: "For Obama, a world of Snowden troubles ... Leaders Obama has wooed - and met recently - were willing to snub the American president."[38]

Pew Research Center: 'Incompetent' and 'liar' are now among the top 5 most frequently used words to describe President Barack Hussein Obama. [39]

Edward J. Snowden apparently lost confidence in the Rule of Law of the amoral communist China and Hong Kong, packed his bags and headed for the increasingly Christian and conservative Russia.

The South China Morning Post reported this morning that Snowden may be en route to Iceland or Ecuador while others have said he is bound for Venezuela via Havana, Cuba. [40]

Mashable admits one of the internet's largest atheist communities, Reddit atheism, has developed a reputation of being "low brow" over the years by "some" (translation: by people who are not "low brow").[41]

Bold evangelism is seeing results in India. 75 - 100 people became Christians in an Indian village. Reports of the miraculous occurring.[42]

Atheist wiki drops in global market share while Gotquestions.org saw an increase in global market share.[43]

Liberal claptrap of the week: "Hillary Clinton wants a female president ‘in my lifetime.’" [44] Translation: Hillary lacks any good reasons for seeking the presidency.

A candidate in a special Senate election may not showcase her own good works in her campaign. Why not? Blame the IRS – and the late Lyndon Baines Johnson. [45]

Mimolette Cheese, a French cheese eaten safely for hundreds of years, is suddenly deemed unsafe by the nannycrats of the Barack Hussein Obama Administration.[46]

Bradlee Dean, speaking out about an attack on one of his teams, calls on America to stop asking permission to obey God. [47]

Hillary Clinton’s daughter Chelsea revealed that her much-admired maternal grandmother was the child of unwed teenage parents who “did not have access to services that are so crucial that Planned Parenthood helps provide.” So Mrs. Clinton would never have been born if abortion had been available. [48]

Liberal double standard: an offensive racial joke by an Obama Cabinet official is somehow not racism, [49] yet the liberal media crucified golfer Sergio Garcia for making an offhand joke about Tiger Woods.

"My Deerest; another tale of evolution" [50]

Hate speech is always defended when a liberal does it. [51]

A New Jersey activist reaches a stunning conclusion: the PRISM system has always been Barack Hussein Obama's ace, and we must shut it down. [52]

Announcing a new grassroots organization evoking the life of Judge Deborah: Women of Faith in Action. [53]

NY Times fact-checkers are unfamiliar with the Bible, and had to issue this correction to a David Brooks column: An earlier version of this column incorrectly identified the biblical texts in which three figures — Saul, David and Esther — appear. Their stories are told in other books of the Jewish Bible, but not in the Torah. The column also incorrectly described a passage from I Corinthians that ends with the statement, “God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.” It was written by Paul, not spoken by Jesus. [54]

Retired investigators of TWA Flight 800, downed a few months before Bill Clinton's reelection in 1996, say that the government "falsified" the findings. [55] Recall that the Clinton Administration imprisoned one reporter for trying to determine the truth.

Bradlee Dean warns Barack Hussein Obama of a Biblical truism: you reap what you sow. [56]

A congressional human rights committee in Brazil approves legislation to authorize psychologists to treat and cure homosexuality. [57] The homosexual agenda continues its decline globally.

Conservative "Rand Paul: Youth with me on NSA issue." [58] "They see [Obama] now as a hypocrite," the likely 2016 presidential candidate observes.

An ugly chapter in the Republican primary for the special Senate election in New Jersey came to a close today. An Administrative Law Judge ruled that Alieta Eck, a newcomer who dared challenge the political establishment, can stay on the ballot. [59]

"Remembering Jesus, really remembering!" by Bishop Bert: [60]

Chinese dissident claims communist China now controls U.S. academia: [61]

State Senator Elbert Guillory of Louisiana becomes another ex-Democrat after seeing that party for what it really is. [62][63] “At the heart of liberalism is the idea that only a great and powerful big government can be the benefactor of social justice for all Americans. But the left is only concerned with one thing: control. And they disguise this control as charity.”

AT&T iPhone Users Forced to Receive Obama Alerts Which Can't Be Turned Off. [64] First the Verizon phone calls scandal and now this.[65]

Russia, fed up with Obama's pushing of the homosexual agenda on its own country, tells Obama to quit trying to overthrow the leadership in Syria. [66]

Edward J. Snowden continues to stand up against Obama by declaring today on a live newspaper blog, "Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped." [67] Why are liberals like Obama so opposed to the public learning the truth?

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons discusses the Internal Revenue Service administering ObamaCare. [68]

Is the reason why atheists are more likely to commit suicide that so many of them have bad relationships with their earthly father and their heavenly father?[69] See: Paul Vitz and Atheism and suicide

If Barack Hussein Obama likes Father's Day so much, then why is the Obama Administration striving so hard to have lesbians get "married".[70]

"Britain's biggest climate problem is with cold winters that lead to thousands of excess deaths." [71] Yet liberal denial continues about the hoax of a global warming crisis.

The world's biggest population of atheists run by secular leftists may implode under crushing debt in about 6 months. Hard landing may be in store for China's economy. [72][73]

Expect the explosive growth of Christianity in China to continue. Biblical Christianity thrives under economic adversity.[74]

‘Natural’ or ‘unnatural’ human behaviour? Many evolutionists consider much of today’s human behaviour ‘unnatural’ — except when it comes to homosexual ‘marriage’.[75]

Now the Obama Administration pretends they do not know where Edward J. Snowden is, perhaps to avoid criticism if Obama tried to extradite him now. [76]

Today, a Question evolution! campaign blog went over 450,000 page views. Also, 20-30 young people will be reading the newest draft of the Question evolution! campaign book for middle school students.[77]

Dr. Joseph James Kennedy: Deceit: the Modus Operandi of Evolution.[78]

Vetoed! Conservative Texas Governor Rick Perry vetoes more than two dozen bills passed by RINOs. [79] Will Perry run for the presidency next?

The President of Equatorial Guinea has warned African leaders not to tolerate, accept or allow the issue of homosexuality to get roots in their countries. Also, 7 reasons why homosexuals have lower moral standards.[80]

News from the Left Coast: "'Less liberal' is the new conservative," as Dems find it necessary to restrain reckless spending by other Dems. [81]

In New Jersey, candidate Steve Lonegan wages an ugly fight before an Administrative Law Judge against a prospective primary opponent. [82][83] A grassroots activist today begs him to knock it off. [84]

Kljghlkjkh.png

Happy Flag Day: "A yearly contemplation of our flag strengthens and purifies the national conscience." — President Calvin Coolidge

God gives victory when His people fight, especially in His Name. [85]

Liberal policies have destroyed Detroit, and now the city defaults on its debt. [86] It may pay only pennies on the dollar to its creditors.

New Jersey grassroots activists have reason to cheer: two genuine conservatives in a Republican special primary for the United States Senate. [87]

Russians overwhelmingly reject liberal values on homosexuality. Lawmakers pass anti-homosexuality bill in a 435-0 vote. Weak gay activists are easily overpowered by police.[88]

Liberal denial continues: Joe Biden denies that George W. Bush defeated Al Gore for president in 2000, and the liberal media praises Biden for his denial! [89]

Southern Baptist Convention blasts Boy Scouts over stance on homosexuality, votes to encourage defectors. [90]

America's first atheist monument to stand outside Florida courthouse.[91]

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) deputy director Michael Morell has "decided to spend more time with his family" and resign post terror attack in Benghazi.[92]

Why moderates leave an acrid taste in a conservative's mouth. [93]

The modern civil rights movement consists of "demoralizers of the faith" – a far cry from Martin Luther King's day. [94]

The Mainstream Media always ignore this key fact about any mass murder story they cover: it happens in a gun-free zone. [95]

Pope Francis plans to purge the Vatican of the "gay lobby," and speaks candidly about the problem. [96] Why aren't Republican Party leaders as candid?

James Clapper, head of the NSA and now under-fire, said in March that he had no knowledge of the massive phone and email collecting by his agency. [97]

The socialist "paradise" of Venezuela is now on the brink of hyperinflation. [98]

Love Obamacare now? If you live in Ohio, your health insurance premiums went up 88% percent. [99]

NSA officials overheard on how to cause Edward Snowden to be "disappeared". [100]

From the IRS "Keep your religious beliefs to yourself." [101] "You cannot, you know, use your religious belief to tell other people you don’t have a belief, so I don’t believe you need the right to do this, start confrontation, protesting, uh, prot, uh, protest...you don’t apply for tax exemption."

The bright Patriots head coach treats the liberal media with disdain in dismissing their inane hostility to Tim Tebow, on his first day of practice. [102]

Is Edward J. Snowden, who revealed the breathtaking extent of how our government monitors us, a hero, or a traitor? Judge for yourself. [103]

The world's biggest mental health research institute is abandoning the new version of psychiatry's "Bible" (DSM-5).[104]

Great Conservative Sports Star Tim Tebow is reportedly joining the New England Patriots, from where he will be able to crush twice-a-year the liberal New York team that cut him. [105] God does indeed have a sense of humor.

Why is big government a Goliath and why should you fear it? Start with watching a girl with cystic fibrosis nearly die from some arcane rule, while the government waives said rule for a big campaign donor. Then remember a little bit of history. [106]

Homeschooling surge underway: Education at home is growing seven times faster than K-12 enrollment. The homeschool option makes perfect sense, "significantly higher ACT-Composite scores as high schoolers and higher grade point averages as college students." [107]

Michael Reagan: Reform the U.S. tax code. [108]

The joke sport of "rhythmic gymnastics" is part of the 2020 Olympic Games roster.[109]

Union jack.jpg

Britain has a debt-to-revenue ratio of 212%. Britain's external debt to GDP ratio was 390% in 2011.[110]

Multi-ethnic, Bible-believing church is adding 40-50 new members a year via the internet. Also, will a "God-ordained meeting" prove to yield more fruit than boring atheist meetings led by boring, white, atheist males? [111]

Conservative Rand Paul may challenge the privacy-invading conduct of the Obama Administration in court. [112] Even a few Dems express their opposition to the Big Brother program.

Promoters of marijuana are quiet about the arrest Saturday of a crane operator charged with causing the deaths of 6 people while under the alleged influence of the drug. [113] Authorities still conceal how much pot was in the system of "College Weed Dealer" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. [114]

Previous Conservapedia Breaking News


View the original article here

Essay:Best New Conservative Words

(Difference between revisions)|fake townhall, kkk teaparty, Agent Provocateur|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous.  |a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous.  |we the people democracy, Minarchism |first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster'sEach year the English language develops about a thousand new words. The King James Version of the Bible contains only about 8,000 different words;[1] many good words have developed since.

Conservative terms, expressing conservative insights, originate at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than liberal terms. Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.

Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a geometric rate, roughly doubling every century. For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,[2] there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of "1-2-4-8". This demonstrates that the future is increasingly conservative.

Century # New Conservative Terms "a.m." means "before noon" in Latin (ante meridiem); it became popular much as "A.D." did. Also, a morning work ethic is a conservative concept. a pejorative term for unnecessarily abstract mathematics of doubtful rigor; liberal denial insists that this term, which describes something as "nonsense", is somehow not negative! the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, are responsible for their wrongdoing. conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of deceit an extraordinary, unforeseeable event, such as a massive flood or earthquake; term was probably inspired as a reference to the Great Flood Newton's acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to electrostatics and quantum mechanics and has a basis in Christianity[4] -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.[5] Materialists censor this concept, while Einstein criticized it as "spooky". this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with Prohibition and efforts to pass the Eighteenth Amendment the intrinsic characteristic of certain things or activities to induce repetitious involvement, usually with a harmful effect on the participant, as in gambling, or video games. invented by the Christian Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper[6] to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title "Aerobics" to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise. propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of global warming excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of liberal style a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: "Amway" opposing Christian ideals and institutions interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care the origin is the passage of the Republican-sponsored Sherman Act to prohibit restraints of trade, one of the greatest pieces of legislation in all of history term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally an official who blindly does what he thinks his government superiors want, as in communism honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. [8] the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism. correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something. It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.[10] The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly. self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that what is known as post-World War II baby boom actually started before the war, contrary to what textbooks teach. Perpetuating the mistake, the U.S. Census Bureau counts the generation born between 1946 and 1964 as the baby boomers.[13] inactive status away from attention, as in "RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner" a woman, typically unmarried, whose life tragically degenerated into a homeless existence of wandering in a city while carrying bags of worthless possessions wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or "E pluribus unum" an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values: "bedrock principles"[14] popularized by Paul Weyrich though possibly first used by then-Governor John Sununu ("captives of yourselves"), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C. a quality standard for which people can strive A term coined by Andy Schlafly to express the idea that one does not need liberal credentials that so-called "experts" have. Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal "expert" test. to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming biased against Christian and Conservative beliefs. an idiotic remark that would subject the politician to enormous ridicule if he were a conservative, but when spoken by liberal Joe Biden the media are just fine with it government constantly watching its citizens; George Orwell first coined this term in his classic, 1984 how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much feminists try to conceal this scientific fact from women Michael Barone quoted Jeane Kirkpatrick as saying that the "San Francisco Democrats" (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) "always blame America first."[17] irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in "a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation" nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in "liberal blather is common in the lamestream media" a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the House of Representatives, which is enough to form a majority with Republicans "popularized during the New Deal as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed." [18] The term gained popularity in Canada following a corruption scandal tied to the Liberal government in 2000. originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator unaided effort, personal merit, hard work coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee Robert H. Bork. it takes an open mind and heart derived from the Chinese term "xinao" soon after the communist takeover of China, "brainwashing" means forced abandonment of faith in favor of regimented atheism. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques. a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something Phrase coined in a short story by Rudyard Kipling that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on entitlements creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources a term used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in Hillary Clinton moving to New York to become a U.S. Senator unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power a reduction in price for payment by cash, in recognition of how cash is more efficient facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the best of the public; first coined by John Adams[22] when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a "caucus club"; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders. an evil or corrupt place or state. care and well-being of youths overseen by adults literally "a gift from God", charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in conservative public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: "global alarmists" are the Chicken Littles of our time[23] another conservative innovation that apparently did not exist earlier, even though mail did; cards that say "Seasons Greetings" are a cheap imitation now. a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west. private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: "the professor wasted the rest of the class on his liberal claptrap" exemplify conservative principles with values, integrity and a work ethic this concept was initially coined by Karl Marx in The Communist Manifesto, but it has become so discredited that it is now used mostly by conservatives to point out liberal demagoguery a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by transaction costs compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of liberal claptrap relating to Christopher Columbus or the United States coined by George Orwell shortly after he wrote Animal Farm,[24] as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress abbreviation for "communist" that captures their simple-minded totalitarianism popularized by Phyllis Schlafly to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions hysteria or alarm, as in "having a conniption fit"; a typical response by liberals when confronted with their double standards and illogical positions overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by Benjamin Franklin but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values[25] a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy without loss, as in the planetary system and electrical products[26] the extra benefit received by consumers above the price they paid for a good or service, illustrating the value of the free market; specifically, consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers would have paid for something, and the lower price they did pay. (noun) something unchanging in value someone who advocates views contrary to that of others; this type of person frustates liberal attempts to gain control Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans taking the easy way out, usually by shirking one's responsibilities extending private property to protect expressive works the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity (verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as atheism or homosexuality and selfishness or lack of charity; liberals falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate. especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the U.S. Supreme Court, "petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world."[30] interfering with a worthy goal. Example usage: "nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive." a movement in response to another movement, as in a counter-reformation to the homosexual agenda concealment by government officials of the truth about a matter of public concern crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality an ability, unique to God and his likeness, to make something from nothing the most effective tool against liberal deceit, better than even the requirement of an oath widespread use after the book Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America by James Davison Hunter a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price a provision of Obamacare that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.[33] the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the "can do" approach of conservatism in a patriotic way a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term an increase in the value of savings refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this. pejorative term directed against collective production by a group Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in "devaluing human life" someone who espouses the position of the wrong side, in order to test, sharpen and strengthen the right side ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a "dog and pony show" in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the Prodigal Son led him to repent and convert a term first coined by George Orwell in his dystopian novel 1984; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of status worship someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else someone whose residency wanders about aimlessly, failing to become a permanent, productive member of any community First coined by the LA Weekly to criticize the LA Times for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.[35] Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: "Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night."[36] the highest rank in the Boy Scouts, the term also means "a straight-arrow and self-reliant man."[37] "A provision in congressional legislation that allocates a specified amount of money for a specific project, program or organization."[38] "to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts"[39] ultimately from the Latin efficientem, meaning "working out, or accomplishing"[40] the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate complex analysis and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, "On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots."[41] Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child ("embryo") that were "scoped" by tiny cameras. widely recognized and even advocated by some,[43] yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof) A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized. someone who opposes joining the super-socialist European Union; some prefer the term "Eurorealist" to express this opposition, and sometimes "Eurosceptic" is used to criticize opponents of the EU often used in the phrase "exculpatory evidence," it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: "incriminate" to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation (noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government Example usage: "The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative." approaching an idea or concept with an open mind first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science: if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false. If not, then the proposition is not scientific. widespread use after a speech by Vice President Dan Quayle, 1992 a place where obese people -- such as self-centered atheists -- might go to try to lose weight someone who fulfills the essential role of a father the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the U.S. Constitution stir up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a communist sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. first coined by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, it refers to the effect on the economy of a sharp drop in spending and perhaps an increase in taxes scheduled to take effect at approximately the same time.[47] verb, meaning to change political position, typically due to liberal pressure. First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset. planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past the several dozen Christian men [48] who helped draft the formative documents of the United States something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that "there's no such thing as a free lunch" in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later. shorthand for "freedom of speech," but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the Slaughter-House Cases by Justice Bradley areas of the world free of communism someone who avoids paying or working for his share of a benefit living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land. non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect -- but perhaps politically motivated -- answers as in, "the liberal proposals galvanized the grassroots in opposition" abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape[49] that favored election of a liberal politician originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a gambling machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943[50] and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term "globalism";[51] the term "globalization" was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense. Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right. the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership how genuine charity is the best approach a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement. easy money for little or no work, in contrast with the work ethic; notice how the Great Depression hit two years later a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' Biblical scientific foreknowledge about the digestive system the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952. an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature describes charity and government giveaways sensless banter among broadcasters in the lamestream media, as a substitute for real news; more generally, happy talk is unjustifiably feel-good rhetoric that implicitly denies the real existence of Hell. an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends, 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty) still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking marijuana rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in "feminists had a hissy fit when Lawrence Summers suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned." to deceive the public into believing something that is false, often to pull people away from the Bible. an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable. This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice. This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals. phony, in an obvious or corny way an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit used to promote the agenda in the book After the Ball, but then used to criticize the movement by Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissent inLawrence v. Texas (2003) originally meant to deceive or "put on," and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, "There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American." a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth From the Latin hystericus, from Greek hystera meaning "womb"[56] (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the womb). liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the public schools are illiterate today more than 150 years before the discovery in physics of the connection between attentiveness/observation and uncertainty/chaos, this conservative word cautioned against inattentiveness create a reward to encourage good work inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of Kurt Godel's work in 1931 imposing bad political or social change slowly values, rights and duties arise from the individual free from error, as in "biblical inerrancy" policies causing inflation of the monetary supply consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion self-starting first step toward improvement to safeguard against future harm by developing immunity against it. Sample usage: "Conservapedia inoculates against liberal claptrap." what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill "we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears." Davoll v. Brown, 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge). coined in Darwin on Trial, a book by Philip Johnson, who is considered the father of the intelligent design movement and who co-founded the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture in 1996[58] "governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country"[59] coined by Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations and widely used today. discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman). coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom coined[60] and later adopted and developed by Michael Behe to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that God must have created it whole into biology; if the Nobel Prize were not dominated by atheism, Behe could win one for this insight. A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism. a description of the pampered culture of liberal professors, and how far out of touch with the truth it is a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence first coined in an article in Fortune magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,[61] and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,[62] yet as of 2009 Merriam-Webster dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term. the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice. "Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed judicial restraint may be commendable."[63] one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by Phyllis Schlafly; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in Paige v. City of Sterling Heights, 476 Mich. 495 (2006).[64] the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice Potter Stewart in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility. the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as Global Warming) the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of John Peter Zenger, but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by Skidmore v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948) one who spoils the pleasure of others. [66] Example-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process. from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4 A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the communist Soviet Union. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). a term for the decadent, liberal culture of Hollywood-driven Los Angeles, originally capitalized as "La-La land."; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983. opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection. coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless Mainstream media that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will. an ability and willingness to lead, often by example a more descriptive term for the West Coast of the United States principles and doctrine of leftists "balanced", "having common sense and sound judgment" liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account. something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in "a lifelong commitment to Christ" a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans use of a single political issue to determine if a candidate or nominee is acceptable common usage: "all politics is local" mindless conformity, often to liberal values a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,[69] synonymous with self-sufficiency an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration: "'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary." (BusinessWeek) the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content a word never used favorably by feminists! the primary support, typically for something good William Safire wrote in the New York Times in 1983, "Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946. The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?"[72] inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean descriptive term used to criticize the legalizing of same-sex marriage in Canada. the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an "ism", the term criticizes such view the most interesting or fundamental part a special American honor for bravery on the battlefield first coined by Conservapedia, media bullying is aggressive bias by the media in the attempt to influence a politician or others, typically toward a liberal goal requires "social and cultural assimilation" for successful immigration[75] a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement the study of the economics of the individual person or business insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to censor progress; Ronald Reagan was critical of this style by Democrat Presidents a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of SDI someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia this has the same date of origin as "productive", and that may not be a coincidence! working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the work ethic at its best coined by Jerry Falwell to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives. can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?! a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others a person who searches out and publicly exposes deceit[76] if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight a term critical of the liberal practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation "Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out."[77] Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here! mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by George Orwell in 1984 a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature action at a distance at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in relativity and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty From Latin obambulatus, to walk to or before, akin to wander. Word currently claimed to have been invented by Rush Limbaugh in 2011 and used in reference to Barack Obama, yet it is found in Oxford and Webster's dictionaries prior to 1991. deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the "fleebaggers") fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform the United States of America flag, Stars & Stripes Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative Grove City College, in criticism of how the government administers student loans: "Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all."[80] The 2008 Republican platform states, "We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules."[81] a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in "the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of Rand Paul" a grassroots conservative response, led by mom-and-pop consumers and pharmacies, against government-approved pesticides and mandatory fluoridation taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical[82] having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph carry a concealed firearm, allowed by permit in nearly every state, yet liberal bias has made dictionaries slow to recognize this term how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle. This tactic is common among those who reject conservative truths, as seen when left-leaning editors leave Conservapedia. a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by conservative Supreme Court Justices. "It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the Solicitor General." De Marco v. United States, 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting); "'Incorporation' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the Fourteenth Amendment in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of Florida has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws." Williams v. Fla., 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) (Stewart, J., dissenting and concurring). Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,[83] it has been used most recently by Ann Coulter Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person. conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position a common trick of the liberal media to push the reader to the political left on an issue, as in displaying a man without teeth as an opponent of a liberal bill or candidate. an unrealistic claim of value about a future materialistic benefit having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to peer pressure or liberal falsehoods when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served This term originated among radicals at the University of Wisconsin-Madison to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.[87] The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936. seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality[88] used by Australian conservative Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones. government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an abortion; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion[89] someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of John Maynard Keynes) Arthur Cecil Pigou in The Economics of Welfare. the setting of prices in interference of the free market; it is illegal for private companies to do this, but government itself sometimes does it to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize. a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences the gap of about 200 years between the creation of "productive" and "productivity" is astounding someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator Ted Kennedy, criticizing him for his "publicity stunt" in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the Chappaquiddick incident sunk his chances three months later. "Playing the race card" consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend. the tendency for people lacking in faith and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress combination of refute and repudiate, as coined by Sarah Palin the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party. the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person distortions of history to promote liberal bias the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door a right to pass through, other rights notwithstanding a more important term than "RINO", because what matters most is whether someone will stand up for a conservative position and candidate when the liberal media demand that everyone flock to the liberal side. the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots (Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people. unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in "Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry." meaning "merely average, commonplace," the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of evolution and relativity a deceptive scheme, which is what most liberal theories are. Interestingly, the origin of the term "scam" is unknown, but its timing near the beginning of the 1960s is telling. a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8. popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, Free to Choose a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others. attempts to educate, particularly through public school, without including faith or even acknowledgment of God Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of "segue" for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation. often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods preservation of oneself from destruction or harm pregnancy => get married. Think of someone besides yourself for a change. trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes the practice of volunteers exercising their right of free speech to advise women against abortion as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and censor this a benefit that is not obvious to see, particularly amid a disappointment underhanded or unscrupulous behavior term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of "it doesn't hurt to try" something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. [97] Widely used during the 1990s to describe Bill Clinton's political strategy. a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke) a law-and-order term, "smoking gun" was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that! staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities; this is a significant voting bloc or demographic group an increasingly pejorative term for liberal attempts to create a "nanny state" someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice. personal reflection about one's own values and morality a variation on "tax-and-spend" (see below), "spend-and-tax" consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view. [99] precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts. a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that another will win, as in "antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'"[100] advocates for centralized government and government ownership a phrase used to describe it more than a decade after its completion a useful baseline for assessing and promoting conservative growth first-rate of its kind, especially a political speech; term inspired by the innovation for the watch to be wound by stem rather than by a key an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to abortion betrayals)[101] the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government popularized by Abraham Lincoln to say that secession is a sugarcoated word for rebellion the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s one who is determined and prepared to stay alive, and even thrive, if liberals cause a breakdown of society proactive leadership for the greater good as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending the word highlights who is really paying for things an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expensive government can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it[102] this was during the French Revolution first coined in Britain to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is Conservapedia the think tank of the future? an approach that has proven to be beneficial over time, like heterosexual marriage the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business "adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism"[103] allowing people who are affected by decisions to see how and why those decisions are really being made. still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal Wikipedia is filled with trivial junk describes a type of liberal deceit: subversion from within popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist deceit an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term "unborn child" itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in Den v. Sparks, 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791) a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could having less than full-time or suitable employment A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system; see Worst College Majors. someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it Sample usage: "There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend." malicious destruction of someone else's property capitalism at its best: funding new and risky enterprises to create wealth for many a verb meaning to screen for flaws a power by one branch of government to restrain another branch, and thereby attain less government overall someone who freely offers to help no listing at Merriam-Webster; on February 2, 2009 (less than two weeks after inauguration), Obama dropped use of this term. [107] no longer productive, as in "the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years." a disparaging term for someone who collects excessive welfare payments through fraud, manipulation, or laziness. First used by Ronald Reagan during his 1976 Presidential campaign. a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure a perception more common in women that something or someone is to be avoided without yet understanding why. a physical measure[111] of effort used to increase energy a habit of working as a moral good coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers[112] a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later. America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see Eli Whitney and Benjamin Franklin. the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion if (window.showTocToggle) { var tocShowText = "show"; var tocHideText = "hide"; showTocToggle(); }

A thousand new words are developed in English each year. Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.

Not Yet Recognized Terms Suggestions Comments terror is jurisdiction of the courts tradition opposer, familiopathic e.g., guns blamed for an increasing murder rate An effort to cooperate and promote an organization or a process to nullify campaigns that are targeted by boycott protests. causing harm by spreading falsehoods e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity principles set in the Declaration Manipulating Man's laws by usurping God's laws. sanctity of life, conception to natural death pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs when the going gets tough, run away from the problem College student debt is now larger than credit card debt in the US mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be "antihadessic" so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots) liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints from Greek/Latin root dolo- meaning guile, deceit, deception [6] pressitutes, Democrat Media Complex a combination of domestic enemy and media, describing the biased media coordination between Democrats the legacy media Liberal professors with no real-world job experience, typically hired by Democrat administrations to implement their ideas, like Cass Sunstein. describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive Describes liberal politicians who avoid their sworn duties as a way to advance their political agenda. Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it From Greek misein, to hate, and Latin patria, nation or homeland natural objects visible in the sky recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. fake townhall, kkk teaparty, Agent Provocateur a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster LGBT Stormtrooper, Gay-vangelist Guardians of gender identity ideology widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term. a government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing. mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin we the people democracy, Minarchism Citizens who base their voting decisions on small issues; contraception, skin color, govt. handouts, etc. instead of character, economic policy, foreign policy. liberal politicians and the liberal media's method of stroking anger to pursue an agenda. media's public campaign to demonize dissent against people or groups, such as Juan Williams. Democrats opposed to entitlement reform use fear to stop changes to Medicare Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. "media idolatry"; "money idolatry"; "celebrity idolatry" idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed ethics and virtues united for the common good of all ethically and spiritually challenged souls a frantic attempt to capitalize on calamity by casting their opponents as somehow responsible for an act of madness and evil the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically dualism has been suggested, but it is not the opposite of materialism; "spiritualism" is not a common term and is the "opposite" of materialism used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994 can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster? proven wrong, a refusal to admit it religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence. too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history. nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet. documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it. much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car. Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media cf. bulletproof. Once John became aware of the extent of liberal deceit, he set about mediaproofing his mind. comparable to brainwashing - Wikipedia's claims and procedures become more important than reality or logic.

These new terms are difficult to classify:

Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others "isms" are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset perhaps this should be on the conservative list? exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation performing multiple tasks all at once Newton may have used it earlier to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it the main character in Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage a combination of a Greek root ("tele", which means "far off") and a Latin root ("commutare", which means "to exchange") a toady caves into peer pressure to seek acceptance by others: "the largest gathering of toadies is by college students herded into Obama campaign rallies" the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills. This term is derived from "whipper-in," which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.[119] a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public those who work regular, 40-hour weeks in manual labor, such as factory jobs

These conservative terms are less significant:

bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb) A term originally used to describe fair, competitive free market conditions.[121] Liberal policies such as affirmative action and progressive taxation have been enacted in the name of leveling the playing field, but by favoring certain groups of people these policies do the opposite. one who opposes and even destroys technological advances timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited; inspired by Caspar Milquetoast, the unassertive character in "The Timid Soul" cartoon strip by Harold T. Webster, which ran in the New York Herald Tribune on Sundays beginning in 1924. "an idle worthless person" - Merriam-Webster restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander [122] refers to reforms curtailing welfare abuse and providing incentives to work rather than earn a government paycheck ? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm? The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then William Shakespeare had written nearly all his plays.? From Pollard v. Shaaffer, 1 U.S. 210, 213 (1 Dall. 210) (Pa. S.Ct. 1787): "In the case before the court, if the lessee had covenanted for himself and his assigns, to deliver up the tenements in good order and repair, notwithstanding they should be destroyed by act of God or of an Enemy, then this action would certainly lie, because of the special express words; but when there are no such words, but only generally to repair &c. would it be reasonable to construe these words so as to extend to the cases put?"? See, e.g., Jesus's cure of the centurion's slave.? http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis? http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm? 1911 is the date given by the "OED", which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.? Merriam-webster- Apple pie? estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.? http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm? A more precise date is welcome; "Austrian school" was coined a bit earlier, initially as a derisive term.? Baby boomer phrases.org.uk, retrieved August 30, 2012? Newsroom: Facts for Features - Special Edition - The Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock? http://www.christianpost.com/news/pastor-greg-laurie-i-hate-the-word-homophobic-83209/? Or "Blame-America-First Crowd"? http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html? http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&searchmode=none? First used by U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Harlan II in United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.? according to the Oxford English Dictionary. Miram-webster gives the date of 1945 ? First use found by Conservapedia was in an article describing a controversy in communist Yugoslavia over their "career politicians," published in the New York Times and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.? The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the Declaration of Independence.? In characteristically liberal style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the global warming example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.? http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html? http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative? The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in multivariable calculus -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is irrotational.? First coined by Cambridge University Professor Alfred Marshall in his acclaimed text, Principles of Economics (1890).? http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html? Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.? Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html? Confirmation of the first use is desired.? See Dr. Frank Luntz, Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear? Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.? Originally "duh!" science: "But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?" "L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT", LA Weekly p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).? Phil Long, "Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail," Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).? Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).? Merriam-Webster's Dictionary (2009).? Merriam-Webster (1994).? Online Etymological Dictionary? http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt? The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum. The date of origin of the term "embryoscopy" may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.? http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html? 1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use. The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.? First coined by The Economist, in "New England's governors; All change" (September 22, 1990), in reference to Lowell Weicker's "loss in 1988 to a Faux-conservative Democrat, Mr Joseph Lieberman."? The New York Times attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.? http://www.benjaminfedwards.com/blog/?p=197? Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com? http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism? http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=globalism&first=1&max_to_show=10&hilite=50095613se2? See Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); see also Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist., 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).? Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch., 533 U.S. 98 (2001)? this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to "choose" the horse closest to the door.? the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to "homeschool".? Meriam Webster Dictionary? A few isolated references to this phrase, without its full current significance, can be found dating back to the mid-1800s? http://biologos.org/resources/johnson-phillip-e? Merriam-Webster (1994).? Alan Turing reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [1]? http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089? United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).? Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).? A similar yet different concept, "judicial supremacy," was coined by conservative Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson as the title of his book, The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power (New York: Knopf, 1941).? http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science? Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web? First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, "Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged," Washington Post F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): "But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ..."? This date refers to its first usage as a noun, which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.? Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster? http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic? This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called Equal Rights Amendment.? Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.? [Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, "The Anatomy of Market Failure," The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1958) [2]? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&oldid=430831 (Apr. 14, 2008)? Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)? Merriam-Webster - Muckraker? Leo Ryan, "Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism," The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)? Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe & Johnson) in Pennsylvania v. West Virginia, 262 U.S. 553 (1923): "It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234."? Was there an earlier conservative use? Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!? http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html? http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf? http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604? Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.? Personhood Dictionary.com? This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.? A letter to the editor by a reader of the liberal Chicago Tribune observed, "This is the third time in recent weeks that a weird or disfigured picture of Mr. Quayle has appeared in your Sunday paper."? For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.? The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: "to give a political tone or character to"? Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.? Usage here refers to "promise", not "possibility".? Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term "stunt" was not coined until 1878.? This is the date of its widespread familiarity.? The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.? Its colloquial use, as in "read them the riot act," began in 1819.? http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt? http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml? Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster? http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/? General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward? Centinel, 1788 (quoted in The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800, By Anson Ely Morse).? Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist? Attributed originally to Lenin, but since used by others like Nobel Prize winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the communists: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [3]? This word as a prior date of origin for its physical meaning.? http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss? Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase Pew Forum, February 2, 2009? An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.? Notice how this predates the modern feminists, who would tend to consider this term politically incorrect.? http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html? Work equals force times distance.? http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html? cradle to grave- no entry found Merriam-Websters? LaBarbera: Apple's action stems from 'homo-facism', OneNewsNow, March 25, 2011? Limited government - Not found Merriam-Webster's? rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters? The first use of this term was in the British magazine The Economist.? In its political usage.? http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html? The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.? http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/228650.html? Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters? [4]

View the original article here

Monday, November 11, 2013

User:Nailstech86


View the original article here

User:Giuseppe4


View the original article here

Talk:Global warming

(Difference between revisions)::You know, it's funny. Very recently, I was on Wikipedia, and I went to the "scientific opinion on climate change" page. It was incredibly biased. it said "the scientific opinion on climate change is that the earth is unequivocally warming", and it didn't even mention anyone who didn't even mention any deniers. That's what I call biased. I wrestled with them for ages, but I couldn't get them to change it, because they were so attached to their ideas. Then, I came here, expecting to find an unbiased site. To my horror, this page is just as biased as Wikipedia, only in the opposite direction. Why is it that all of these encyclopedia's have to be so radically leftist or rightist as to be completely biased? Why can't this page be UNBIASED, and show each side equally? If people think that only showing the RADICAL conservative opinion on climate change is going to make people take this site seriously, they're definitely wrong. -Cybersaur::You know, it's funny. Very recently, I was on Wikipedia, and I went to the "scientific opinion on climate change" page. It was incredibly biased. it said "the scientific opinion on climate change is that the earth is unequivocally warming", and it didn't even mention anyone who didn't even mention any deniers. That's what I call biased. I wrestled with them for ages, but I couldn't get them to change it, because they were so attached to their ideas. Then, I came here, expecting to find an unbiased site. To my horror, this page is just as biased as Wikipedia, only in the opposite direction. Why is it that all of these encyclopedia's have to be so radically leftist or rightist as to be completely biased? Why can't this page be UNBIASED, and show each side equally? If people think that only showing the RADICAL conservative opinion on climate change is going to make people take this site seriously, they're definitely wrong. -CybersaurRegarding the claim of global warming being a hoax. The definition of hoax is a deliberate deception. The citations after the the articles claims of global warming being a hoax do not in fact support that conclusion. The emails of one scientist do not imply that tens of thousands of climate researchers are deliberately in cahoots to deceive the public. Though the science is woefully incomplete there is no evidence that the research is a hoax. I believe the article would be more credible the word hoax was deleted. Any feedback? [[User:CenterK|CenterK]] 02:04, 1 July 2013 (EDT)

Merge with Science of global warming? DanH 23:31, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

good idea

if (window.showTocToggle) { var tocShowText = "show"; var tocHideText = "hide"; showTocToggle(); }

You guys are right that there isn't a widespread popular consensus for global climate warming change, but as a conservative I feel like we should try to figure out what is really going on instead of going with the current popular trends. There must be a reason that the National Academy of Science -a non partisan organization- concluded that "a strong, credible body of scientific evidence shows that climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems", and that 97% of global scientists studying the issue have built a consensus around this idea. While I am still not convinced, I think we need to take a second look at the evidence instead of flatly denying global warming's existence based on the tiny fraction of the world's climate we see in our immediate vicinity. Looking outside and seeing snow and -50 degree temperatures tells us nothing about global climate trends, no matter how easy it might be to lampoon Al Gore when this happens. I do hate that guy though. 2010 is on track to be the warmest year on record, no matter how cold your backyard is. As conservatives, I think we need to move toward accepting that there is overwhelming evidence for global warming (or climate change, whatever we want to call it). However, we should advocate market based solutions, like big time tax cuts for American clean energy companies and people who innovate, instead of the crap and trade the libs are trying to shove down our throats! let's do what reagan did, and that is recognize environmental problems and advance free market policy to solve them! common sense people. Moderate , 18 November 2010

I think the problem is that leftists have intertwined the term "global warming" with their evidence-lacking anthropogenic global warming theory; the two terms are incorrectly used together and many times interpreted as meaning the same thing, but they should be separate from each other. Evidence and current data prove that global warming has not occurred since 1995, although warming periods have happened before - these temporary periods of global warming are not due to man-made changes. These are scientific findings based on data which Professor Phil Jones has admitted as fact. Global warming may have happened in the past, but there is simply no scientific data present today that suggests humans are the cause of these natural periods of global warming and global cooling. The anthropogenic global warming theory does, however, present a great opportunity for progressives to force big government policies onto the American people; although, it is my interpretation that such policies are unconstitutional because allowing the government to enforce this environmental agenda via cap and trade is not inline with the principles of limited government. DerekE 14:04, 19 November 2010 (EST) However much we despise liberals and the cap and trade bill, we must also consider the actual merits of the issue. Even if global warming is false--a point I am by no means convinced of--many of the policies that would fight it are also good for the economy, such as tax cuts for clean, sustainable energy companies, including nuclear, as well as targeted tax policy to combat pollutants that we know harm the environment and our health, like smog and smoke from factories. Ending our dependence on fossil fuels should not be dismissed because of disbelief in the notion of global warming, in fact, it should be embraced by conservatives for several reasons. 1. It takes the main source of revenue away from middle-east dictators ($700 B per year according to Sen. McCain), 2. It would help America create new industries and again lead the world in manufacturing cutting edge goods, and 3. It would eliminate the cloud of awful smog sitting above my head right now! Maybe I would be able to see some stars at night for once!. Do you agree that we should pursue a renewable energy, market-based agenda regardless of whatever global warming garbage the liberals try to manufacture?Moderate 17:10, 19 November 2010 (PST) Many centrists are now convinced of Global Frauding. Climategate showed how deep the lies really are. User:Teapartyman You know, it's funny. Very recently, I was on Wikipedia, and I went to the "scientific opinion on climate change" page. It was incredibly biased. it said "the scientific opinion on climate change is that the earth is unequivocally warming", and it didn't even mention anyone who didn't even mention any deniers. That's what I call biased. I wrestled with them for ages, but I couldn't get them to change it, because they were so attached to their ideas. Then, I came here, expecting to find an unbiased site. To my horror, this page is just as biased as Wikipedia, only in the opposite direction. Why is it that all of these encyclopedia's have to be so radically leftist or rightist as to be completely biased? Why can't this page be UNBIASED, and show each side equally? If people think that only showing the RADICAL conservative opinion on climate change is going to make people take this site seriously, they're definitely wrong. -Cybersaur

Regarding the claim of global warming being a hoax. The definition of hoax is a deliberate deception. The citations after the the articles claims of global warming being a hoax do not in fact support that conclusion. The emails of one scientist do not imply that tens of thousands of climate researchers are deliberately in cahoots to deceive the public. Though the science is woefully incomplete there is no evidence that the research is a hoax. I believe the article would be more credible the word hoax was deleted. Any feedback? CenterK 02:04, 1 July 2013 (EDT)

I just wanted to explain why I deleted the material that was in place on this matter and why I disagree with its reinstatement, rather than getting into an edit war.

Yes there are measurements from other planets that go back several years but that does not constitute a continuous measurement period. The temporal and spatial coverage of such measurements varies each time and is naturally very limited in this respect. Measurements taken relatively close together in time have shown stark differences that cannot simply be said to be climate change but rather are natural short time-scale variations in time and space as you would find if you compared the temperature in the Sahara and the Antarctic on different days and with each other. The data that does exist has not been sufficient for scientists to produce running averages with anything like the reliability of those used for earth. Long-term trends are built using these figures not simply single temperature measurements from irregular times and places. As such it is not possible to make any accurate claims about climate change on these planets within the past few decades based on the available data. RobertWDP 21:56, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Congrats RobertWDP, I love when you follow the rules like that, we want respectable contributors as yourself. I feel that you are knowledgeable on the climate subject. If you say the data is inconclusive (other planets) and therefore cannot be used. I am not convinced. Show me studies that solar system planets have no bearing on Earth climate models, then cite references as proof.--jpatt 22:25, 26 February 2009 (EST) I shall try to elaborate on points Robert has already made. We do not have ice core samples from Neptune or Pluto. We don't have fossil data from Mars or Titan. What data we do have is at best a starting point for further analysis. On Earth we have much more data, and we also have the ability to carry out almost any experiment. As Robert said, what data we do have about the climates of other planets is absolutely useless for establishing a model of any kind. It could be that Mars is undergoing a typical cycle of climate change that is unique to its environment. We don't know. It could be that Neptune is warming because more gasses than normal are collapsing to the center of the planet and releasing heat caused by the friction of the particles rubbing against each other as they fall. We don't know. Premises don't spring from nothing, so we can't make an argument out of facts that we don't have. It is also a bad idea to compare the climates of gas giants with rocky planets: the differences are so extreme that it is hardly worth going over. I'll end by saying this: If common argument is that we don't really understand the Earth's climate, then how are we to know it any better through comparison of environments that we know almost nothing about? Jirby 00:01, 27 February 2009 (EST) I'll add that if ALL our solar system is getting warm at the same time, insufficient evidence? I believe that's the data that was presented, was at least cited. I am all for the truth in this matter. If you have a source, add it but don't delete the point that is countered.--jpatt 00:09, 27 February 2009 (EST) If the entire solar system was warming at the same rate in the same instance (now) then you would have a very compelling case that human impact is far less than originally believed. However, we currently lack those facts if they in fact exist at all. Gas giants are not analogous to rocky planets; reasons for their climate change(s) is an entirely different matter for science to investigate. Also consider that the outer planets receive very little solar energy; the entire idea that the sun could provide sufficient energy to increase their average temperature is not based in reality. Mars could be warming because it is unable to deflect any appreciable amount of solar energy it receives. We have an atmosphere, and a magnetic shield of sorts to mitigate the influx of solar energy, so if we could take humanity out of the equation, Earth would likely warm at a much lower rate than Mars or any other planets if just due to solar activity alone. The truth is though, that we just don't know. There's no credible way to link the climates of different planets in the fashion this section does. Gaseous planets obviously can't be compared to our own, and the conditions inherent to the other planets open up so many variables that we have no hope of meaningfully comparing them to our own in the near (or even distant) future. What I mean by all this is that you don't really need a cited source (though I accept where the burden appropriately lies) to realize that you can't compare apples to oranges.Jirby 00:31, 27 February 2009 (EST) "the entire idea that the sun could provide sufficient energy to increase their average temperature is not based in reality" I am disagreeing but I don't know what I am disagreeing about. Sunlight on Pluto is insufficient for solar temperature fluctuations? --jpatt 00:51, 27 February 2009 (EST) Consider the distances involved: Pluto is so far away that the sun would at best appear as a very bright star if you stood on the surface and tried to find it. Granted, Pluto isn't so far away that it receives no solar energy whatsoever, but the amount (inverse square law) is so negligible that you can't ascribe significant weight to it. In fact, Pluto only warms to the point of having a minimal atmosphere after it's orbit changes by almost 3 billion miles. I don't want to run into 90/10 problems, but again I gotta ask: how can we compare Pluto to the Earth, or even Mars to the Earth when they are so different that they are barely similar?Jirby 01:05, 27 February 2009 (EST) The sun is gigantic! [1] --jpatt 01:15, 27 February 2009 (EST) And what's your point?Jirby 14:59, 27 February 2009 (EST) The sun is everything, all encompassing, all powerful and to say comparing planets in our solar system are like comparing apples with oranges, I say hooey! The IPCC hasn't taken into account sun irradiation, solar spots, and a host of other issues. Their findings are the heart of Global Warming Politics. It has already been disproved no matter how many agree to its findings. As YECs correctly point out, you can't just throw seven apples on the floor, all at once, perfectly spaced. Yet, God aligned the planets in our system that way. God controls the destiny of Earth, not man. God tells us it is a sin to worry. Leave mother nature for God to decide. As said in 'Platoon', "We all gotta die sometime." Bot capture guy says what? --jpatt 01:27, 4 March 2009 (EST)

So are you telling me that the most extensively studied body in the sky, has somehow been omitted from all studies related to global warming despite the very necessary fact that the sun is probably the most important part of our climate (Being the driving force and all...)? I mean not to sound condescending, but the sun has been factored into every single climate model period because without the sun we don't really have a climate. The verdict? The sun is not the primary causative agent behind global warming. If the sun's output was so high that it was warming Pluto at (for the sake of argument) the same rate as Earth, we'd be dead. So the outer planets no, don't indicate anything about the climates of the inner planets unless it is understood that the outer planets (especially the gas giants) have some analogous variables as the inner planets do.

Also, please note that the IPCC is usually criticized for /understating/ global warming, but it's predictions are still "There is GW, humans activity is the cause." The more nuanced questions of "by how much..." "by what specific behavior..." have yet to be answered, no one disagrees there, but we can't answer those questions if we must continually go back and reassert that what we already know to be true is true.

Also what is perfectly spaced about the planets? Pluto went (back when it was a planet, though I still personally consider it such) from 9th farther to 8th farthest planet depending on when you looked at it. Uranus is helplessly tilted on its side. Saturn's rings are also note stable. What about any of this is perfection? If your idea of perfection is rooted in the tradition of Platonic forms, then I could see your point, but then again always assigning God as the reason why X occurred when we don't currently know only sets up God to fail in the long run when we DO figure it out. If God exists, and I assume he does, he does not exist in such a way that we can view him through a telescope.Jirby 15:18, 5 March 2009 (EST)

This is a typical argument, used by liberals to trick the ignorant. I don't know whether you are a trickster or one of the tricked, but it doesn't matter. The sun's output consists of energy and matter. The energy that heats the earth is infrared light, which is what McDonald's uses to keep the French Fries warm. The matter is called cosmic rays, but these are actually charged particles; they move slower than the speed of light. Variations in the energy output of the sun have little effect on the earth's climate, but variations in cosmic rays have a significant effect. The difference between a sincere person and a liberal liar depends on whether he'll stop saying something after he finds out that it is not true. So, I'll ask you: if someone can prove to your satisfaction that variations in solar output, i.e., cosmic rays, have a greater effect on the temperature of the earth's atmosphere, will you stop saying otherwise? --Ed Poor Talk 11:20, 29 September 2009 (EDT)

Again, I shall bring this issue here rather than risk reverting an admin.

Jpatt, you state quite blatantly that Boykoff is biased towards global warming. I have to ask at this point (this is actually a question not an attempt at an insult in case of any apparent ambiguity) if you have read any of his research or actually know where his grants come from? If the answer is no to the latter in particular then such comments as you have added to the article would amount to libel, which it would be virtually impossible for you to defend against. I am familiar with his work and so hopefully can be of some use here. Boykoff's work is not actually so much research on the science of climate change itself. He actually studies how climate change (amongst other things) is portrayed and perceived by politicians, the public, and the media, not to mention the actual climate scientists. As such the funding for such research which generally involves looking at freely available material, mostly newspaper articles, is pretty negligible, especially when compared to actual climate studies that I assume you are referring to. Although I admit I cannot state for certain the actual source of the funding, I would be quite certain it is from a source that specifically funds media research and not actual climate studies. As such, Boykoff is actually studying issues such as possible bias regarding the issues of climate science, especially in politics and reporting and even mentions media bias on numerous occasions. RobertWDP 07:09, 27 February 2009 (EST)

Further, I would request that if my points above are not adequately addressed (i.e. the removal of libellous claims about an individual) then I would instead request that you simply allow me to remove all reference to the person's work rather than have it and him portrayed in such a way. RobertWDP 07:15, 27 February 2009 (EST) Please note that I have now done this. There should be little argument not only due to my points above but also as I added the references in the first place. I am disappointed at te attitude that has been taken by some. RobertWDP 19:01, 27 February 2009 (EST)

The grammar and punctuation in the quotation from Obama in the article could be improved.

The ecological movement generally has been described as a white attempt to stop non-whites' industrialising, a middle-class attempt to stop working-class whites' industrialising, an attempt to conjure up salaries for millions of scientists or an emotional substitute for failed socialism.

Edited the section of liberal claims of consensus. There are more groupos than liberals that are claiming consensus on this issue. Moreover, that information seems old, maybe the whole article should be refreshed.

Also, took away the quotation marks from "consesus", otherwise it looks stupid.~~

No only liberals, make the claim that there is consensus. They claim that there is consensus, with other groups but that doesn't make it so. Also, it's better to have quotation marks since then we emphasize that there isn't any real consensus. Finally your spelling, could be improved.

Working on other stuff myself, but thought this may be note worthy for an editor, though its depth and impact is yet to be ascertained:

Hackers Prove Global Warming Is A Scam

"One particular thing you said - and we agreed - was about the IPCC reports and the broader climate negotiations were working to the globalisation agenda driven by organisations like the WTO."

Also The Dog Ate Global Warming Interpreting climate data can be hard enough. What if some key data have been fiddled?Daniel1212 09:39, 21 November 2009 (EST)

http://newsbusters.org/node/11640

Here or on the controversy page?Daniel1212 22:47, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Good question, but not an urgent one. We need to start separating the science of global warming from the politics. The "greenhouse effect" is real, but the threat of a runaway greenhouse effect is overhyped, and politicized science has contaminated the educational process. We need to give our series of global warming-related articles an overhaul. --Ed Poor Talk 00:55, 22 November 2009 (EST) This an excellent point. I haven't gone through it fully to check every source, but I did notice the source on the consensus of climatologists about anthropogenic global warming is from 1992, and the results of current polls are almost a full 180 degree change from the ones in the 1992 poll.--Manhattan I'll post the links and such here, so I could hopefully get an edit green-lighted. Heres an article on the survey http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090119210532.htm and hers the survey itself http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf.--Manhattan

There's really no reason for the sections regarding the 'politics' and 'liberal claims of consensus' to come first. It seems appropriate that all of the scientific sections should come first in an article about a scientific issue.

Also, while I understand that many global warming supporters have a liberal inclination, doesn't this seem a bit biased: "Liberal claims of consensus"?JPope 13:01, 11 December 2009 (EST)

No bias on our part. First, it is mostly liberals who claim there is a scientific consensus on whether global warming is more natural or artificial. Secord, the "claim of consensus" is entirely manufactured, contradicting all surveys actually conducted of climate scientists. Less than 1/3 of scientists polled accept any of the key ideas of the Anthropogenic global warming theory. --Ed Poor Talk 21:21, 6 February 2010 (EST)

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/ice-at-the-north-pole-in-1958-not-so-thick/ Good picture that should be public.Daniel1212 20:38, 15 December 2009 (EST)

Cut from intro:

into the atmosphere is increasing the temperature of the world by changing the ability of heat to escape the atmosphere. Some gases attributed with causing this effect are produced by industrial and power plants, while many others come from natural phenomena. In addition to atmospheric gas content, many other factors control the earth's temperature, which has its own pattern of heating and cooling. While many climate scientists have insisted that man-made pollution has caused dangerous warming, some computer models designed to predict long term trends fail to predict recent short-term cooling that the Earth is experiencing. [1] Because 1998 was the year of El Nino, a natural phenomenon that occurs intermittently and causes the year in which it occurs to be anomalously hot, the relation of that year to longer trends is unclear. As temperatures have been falling since 1998, increasing doubt is being cast on the validity of global warming claims.

We need to distinguish between:

a period of rising world air temperatures a scientific theory about what causes the above what activists mean when they say things like, "Global warming is real"

The first is easy enough. It happens when air temperatures go up.

The second requires explaining all the various major theories explaining this. Liberals hate this, because this gives something for conservatives to compare with reality (see independent review).

The third is tricky, because you have to unravel the tangled political rhetoric. --Ed Poor Talk 10:50, 4 January 2010 (EST)

? Earth Cools, and Fight Over Warming Heats Up, Wall Street Journal, 2 November 2009

Cut from intro:

... leading the organization whose e-mails were released to provide clearer peer review evidence supporting their earlier claims

First off, peer review is not the same as independent review. Journal editors have a system of peer review that they use to help them decide whether or not to publish an article. However, that decision can be affected by the bias of the editor or publisher, such as choosing only to publish articles that support a given theory.

Independent review, on the other hand, is not related to any specific journal or editor. It is the ongoing process whereby all the scientists in the world constantly look at each other's work. If they find errors, they say so right away - whether in private or in public. Science advances when scientists use elements of the scientific method such as ensuring that every hypothesis is falsifiable (see also reproducible results).

The entire problem with the last 10 or 20 years of "global warming" advocacy is that contrary views have been suppressed (see intelligent design and "Expelled"). An abuse of the peer review system has undermined independent review. --Ed Poor Talk 11:00, 4 January 2010 (EST)

Someone added a clearly incorrect "fact", with attribution to a "History Encyclopedia" which turned out to be Wikipedia in disguise:

If their biased findings are to be believed, the IPCC concluded that the global average surface temperature warmed about 0.6 °F during the 20th Century. Growing Signals of Global Warming U.S. History Encyclopedia

Whoever did this should not be allowed to contribute to this article any more. F = Fahrenheit, and C = Centigrade. The IPCC conclusion was for centigrade (or Celsius as non-Americans like to say). --Ed Poor Talk 07:21, 31 January 2010 (EST)

Hey, Ed....What do you think of moving this to Global Warming Conspiracy? Just an idea, in the interest of accuracy. --?K/Admin/Talk 08:57, 31 January 2010 (EST)

No, TK, we will always need an article on global warming, because it is "real" - in the sense of occurring naturally over and over throughout history. Every ice age has been followed by an interglacial period when temperatures go back up again.

We must separate the independently reviewed science from the politically motivated distortions, which is a confusing and complicated task. Science is hard enough, but when you have 90% of the mainstream media controlled by liberal "advocacy journalists" the job is ten times as hard. --Ed Poor Talk 14:03, 6 February 2010 (EST)

Splitting the article between complementary "Climate Change" and "Anthropogenic Global Warming Conspiracy" articles (Or Man-caused? Anthropogenic is just too long) might help. DouglasA 14:08, 6 February 2010 (EST) I don't like the term climate change, if it's nothing more than a euphemism for AGW. About 4 years ago, when I almost had the pro-AGW pov-pushers stopped at Wikipedia, they decided to change the terminology. This had the desired effect of confusing everybody and bought them more time. There are only two things going on here: Scientific theories about what makes the earth's atmosphere get warmer and colder Attempts to promote treaties and taxes, based on these theories We don't need a lot of different articles. "Global warming" should be the main science article - split into sub-articles for ease of writing; "Global warming controversy" should be about the political clash between the two main sides: liberals and their ilk who support AGW theory because they want the Kyoto Protocol, carbon taxes, etc. & conservatives along with a few brave independent scientists who oppose the AGW because it's contradicted by the facts.

Various claims have been made that this or that recent year is the "warmest" in recent memory. Then, this claim is used to argue that the global warming theory must be true. This is in the same category as claiming that there has never been a time when there was open, ice-free water at the North Pole, or that the polar bear population is decreasing, or that some famous glacier or snow-capped mountain has less ice.

None of these claims - even if true - would have any bearing on whether human beings are heating up the atmosphere too much (see global warming theory). But shouldn't liberals admit their theory is nothing but hot air, if any of these claims are disproven? Of course not, the public can't concentrate on the science long enough! The liberals just quickly change the subject to another claim.

Anyway, this article would probably be a good place to rebut all these claims. Who wants to help? --Ed Poor Talk 21:17, 6 February 2010 (EST)

I know that many of us are skeptical about global warming and that's great, we should cover all the reasons for skepticism in this article. But many Conservatives do believe in Global Warming. I'm one of them. Newt Gingrich is another. So I don't see this as a thing where anyone who believes NASA is a liberal. I want lower taxes, I want smaller government, but I think we can lower pollution and reduce our dependence on foreign oil at the same time and both are good for our country. Lindsay graham said as much himself, and I think McCain did too.

I think we need to balance this article, not between libs and Conservatives, but between Conservatives who are convinced about global warming and Conservatives who aren't.Mpauline 14:32, 11 February 2010 (EST)

You're absolutely right that not all conservatives believe in global warming. (And I'm surprised you didn't cite Margaret Thatcher next to Gingrich!) And I don't think anybody can be against reducing our dependence on foreign oil. I believe everybody agrees: the less reliant we are on the Middle East, the better. But the recent ClimateGate scandal should increase your doubt somewhat, I'd hope, about global warming. More and more, evidence is coming forward which demonstrates that this has all been either an outright fraud or an extraordinary exaggeration of regular and natural climate cycles. Nevertheless, if you would like to propose any large-scale edits to the article, you're welcome to! Post your suggested additional section here, for review by the most senior administrators, and perhaps they will be added to the article. JacobB 14:38, 11 February 2010 (EST)

Jacob, I understand why you might think that and I respect your opinion. I, personally, think that the day we put a man on the moon was about the best proof ever that this is the best country that's ever been. I love our space program, I love our science and technology, and I believe that science comes up with the best answers about things like this.

There was a scam at the institute in England and the IVPP is exaggerated, you are right. Gore is a dope, no question. But NASA has been taking thousands of satellite and weather station measurements and they say the CO2 level is going up, the earth is warming, and that it's caused by the extra CO2 we are burning. It's millions of tons of coal and oil and natural gas we burn every year. I understand about interglacial periods and so on, but even then, even if it was natural, taking CO2 out of the atmosphere would be our best option for saving our agriculture and avoiding a lot of trouble.

Even Rick Warren, the guy who wrote the book that my wife gave me that made me accept Jesus as my Lord and Savior, agrees that we need to do something about it.Mpauline 14:59, 11 February 2010 (EST)

I agree with JacobB. I think any claims made prior to ClimateGate on Global warming should be invalid until/unless more recent, similar claims are again said by the same politicians who previously thought Global warming was caused by humans. It's one thing to agree with what the "consensus" of scientists have claimed over the last decade as possibly true, but it doesn't seem fair or right to suggest that the same people still have the same opinion of the consensus after it's found their "science" could be less than accurate. DerekE 15:03, 11 February 2010 (EST) Mpauline, please! I'm also a huge supporter of the space program. So was President Bush, and now Obama's killing the budget for it! We clearly agree on many issues, and if you're conservative you'll find you have common ground with basically everybody here. When it comes to climate change, we could argue all day - but let's not! Instead, put on this talk page below the section you wish to add to the article, and people with far more authority than me will review your proposed edit, and we'll reach an outcome that we're all pleased with. You know the old saying, "You cut, I chose?" for reaching compromise? Well, first you have to cut, ie, show us your proposed edit. JacobB 15:07, 11 February 2010 (EST)

You got it Jacob. Thanks. I'll put something up soon. Derek, that's a fair point, but the new NASA report came out after the Climategate scandal. They were making exaggerated claims over there in England, but I believe that our American capabilities are way better. NOAA and NASA's new measurements say the oceans got hotter in the last ten years than they've ever measured.Mpauline 15:31, 11 February 2010 (EST)

NASA and NOAA won't do any better, given the current administration's penchant for buying into man being the cause of climate change. The Earth has warmed and cooled repeatedly, over thousands of years. That is natural, put in motion by God, and if someone believes they can do anything to change those cooling and warming periods, they are nuts. Simply put, if it is God's plan that we cease to exist, that is it. If His plan is for us to survive He will be the cause of mankind's salvation, not man. If one accepted what atheists believe to be true, I still would say man's puny attempts to change forces on a scale millions of times greater than us would be doomed to failure...if we all went off fossil fuels tomorrow, perhaps we would succeed in slowing such warming by a few years. What then? --?K/Admin/Talk 15:52, 11 February 2010 (EST)

OK, TK, I respect that, and many other Conservatives believe that. But that is not what all Conservatives believe. Myself and many other Evangelical Christians believe that God very well might expect us to clean up our own mess. I assure you that NOAA and NASA know full well about natural cycles in the climate. They know full well that there was no ice at the poles in the Paleocene. They have taken natural cycles into account, but they say the CO2 levels and temperatures are going up much faster than they do during natural cycles, and they know this from air bubbles trapped in ice cores. JacobB above is right, President Bush supported NASA and NOAA just like Reagan did. And, you know, I know that liberals believe in global warming, and I don't like agreeing with them, but even they can be right about one thing. I mean, Al Gore probably believes that 2+2=4, and I'm not going to say the answer is 5 just to disagree with him on every single thing. I know I won't convince you and I'm already convinced by teh evidence I've seen. We both have good points. This article should reflect the range of opinion among Conservatives on the subject, don't you think?Mpauline 17:12, 11 February 2010 (EST)

You completely mistake what I believe. We do agree that presenting the facts is important, however. --?K/Admin/Talk 20:03, 11 February 2010 (EST)

Article is locked, but this could be included in this section: “The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot..” “Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers. . . all point to a radical change in climate conditions and . . . unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone . . . Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones . . . while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.” - Washington Post, Nov. 2, 1922, based upon a report from the National Weather Review. [2] Daniel1212 23:06, 3 March 2010 (EST)

The first picture a reader sees in this article is Composite antarctic NASA.jpg, a map showing Antarctica with colors indicating temperature changes. The page where the image originally was, http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=36736, shows a scale, in which even pale red represents a (slight) increase in temperature. The article uses the picture with a caption including the words "Overall, Antarctica shows more cooling than warming, especially in the east, the area to the right". Just from looking at the picture, it's obvious that even the east half is mostly red.

The picture doesn't seem especially relevant to the first section of the article, anyway.

The article might be better off using another picture like Las-vegas-snow-storm-12-2008-christmas.jpg. It's a lot easier to see that picture's meaning in a quick glance, and we could still use the Antarctica picture lower in the article for another purpose.

I don't believe that man-made global warming is happening either, but this picture isn't the first one I'd choose for an article debunking the overblown claims. DouglasL 19:20, 6 January 2011 (EST)

I have not been following the man made global warming issue in recent weeks (post Climategate) and what the possibly effects could be, but I can tell you that it is going to be a hard sell in America because: America has a down economy that seems will continue to get worse plus Obama's re-election is a long shot (Republican candidates are opposed to supporting the global warming issue), Americans prefer big cars and big houses, America has a strong oil lobby, has public schools which are doing a lousy job of teaching math/science, plus Americans value personal choice more than most nations. I don't see much happening on this issue over the next 5 years in terms of any changes. Conservative 03:56, 23 October 2011 (EDT)

Apparently we have 50 months left[3]. Can't see it making much difference though. And even if it did in most countries the US and China don't seem very positive. I suppose it is just time to be thankful that we don't live in Kiribati. (unless of course we do, in which case just hope we can emigrate somewhere) Cmurphynz 09:35, 1 October 2012 (EDT)

Why is there a section about beneficial effects of global warming ? Am I the only one who find it odd ? There is 2 options:

The most plausible is that global warming is a huge hoax, therefore, there is absolutely no interest to speak about any possible beneficial effects The other option is that global warming is real. In this case, the few beneficial effects are completely shadowed by the threat of sea level rise which may threaten millions of human lives.

--PhilipN 18:12, 10 January 2012 (EST)

Those are not the only 2 options. It is possible that global warming is not a hoax, but is also not anthropogenic. It is also possible that global warming is real, but its effects will not be nearly as devastating as liberal scientists claim. --AaronT 18:30, 10 January 2012 (EST) I agree that these are not the only 2 options but that does not change the point. If global warming is real but not anthropogenic, we are in my 2nd case. If global warming is not as devastating as liberal scientists claim, we are either in the 1st case (if there is not sea level rise, I think we won't notice the difference) or in the 2nd (if we notice the difference, there is a huge probability that sea level will rise).--PhilipN 18:43, 10 January 2012 (EST) The two cases I gave are not mutually exclusive. But you probably are correct, that none of the beneficial effects mentioned in the article can occur without severe negative effects as well. --AaronT 18:53, 10 January 2012 (EST) I think that having a section to talk about benefits could be useful because (I'm pretty sure) it is true about the lengthened growing season and it also seems likely that less people would die from freezing to death. However, I do agree that it is strange not to include anything about the drawbacks, because that is almost an accepted concept in our current culture; i.e. most people equate global warming with negative effects. I would like to point out that the sea level rise, even according to the liberals, won't happen until at least 100 years from now. I propose that the benefits of global warming section be merged with the Reported effects of Climate Change section, so we can keep it all together. Also, I think the entire Reported effects of Climate Change section is one of those subtle vandalism thingys, usually written by a liberal to make Conservapedia look bad. I didn't want to delete it in case someone was actually trying to be serious. Scottma 12:50, 2 February 2012 (EST)

Your question sounds like a rhetorical one, i.e., an assertion that warmer weather isn't beneficial. Please write an article section on the benefits and drawback of warmer weather. For example, how does it affect crop growth or human health? Do more or fewer people die in warmer climates than in colder climates. (Why do retirees tend to move south say, from, New York or Boston to Florida? Are they knowledgeable or ignorant about the connection between warmth and longevity?) --Ed Poor Talk 14:44, 31 December 2012 (EST)

Ed, such an article section would be quite lengthy. While retirees may well move to Florida to find a more salubrious climate, we must also take into account the vastly-increased incidence of certain diseases in tropical climates. Yellow Fever, for example, is all but unheard-of in northerly climates in this day and age, but still kills many people every year in parts of Africa and South America. This is, in large part, because the weather never grows cold enough to kill off the mosquitoes that spread the disease. Given the many factors that would need to be taken into account, I fear that such a section, properly researched, would dwarf the rest of the article. Perhaps a separate article would be more appropriate? --Benp 14:57, 31 December 2012 (EST)

I want to delete the section on sunspot activity, as it is misguided and certainly wrong. The article is dated and the prediction made by the scientist, Willie Soon, that the Earth would start to cool after 2009 did not come to pass (2010 was the hottest year ever recorded). On 1/30/12, NASA released an article [1] which refutes the claims made by Willie Soon. Of course, I don't want to remove it if some people still think it could be still useful unless every agrees that it should be removed.

Basically, the deal is that Dr. Soon thought sunspots contributed significantly to global temperature. Here are links to NASA's website showing average global temperature [2] and sunspot activity [3]. You can see that the two do not correlate, especially in the last couple years. Strikingly, sunspot activity is at the lowest its been in about 100 years, and the global temperature is the highest its been in at least 100 years. Scottma 17:57, 1 February 2012 (EST)

? http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-01/nsfc-eeb013012.php ? http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/ ? http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum/

I found a good website with some facts about the GW hoax, don't know if it will pass as a good source but deserves a good look...[1]User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 12:20, 31 December 2012 (EST)

I put this at the top of the page under a different title, but nobody pays attention to that part:

You know, it's funny. Very recently, I was on Wikipedia, and I went to the "scientific opinion on climate change" page. It was incredibly biased. it said "the scientific opinion on climate change is that the earth is unequivocally warming", and it didn't even mention anyone who didn't even mention any deniers. That's what I call biased. I wrestled with them for ages, but I couldn't get them to change it, because they were so attached to their ideas. Then, I came here, expecting to find an unbiased site. To my horror, this page is just as biased as Wikipedia, only in the opposite direction. Why is it that all of these encyclopedia's have to be so radically leftist or rightist as to be completely biased? Why can't this page be UNBIASED, and show each side equally? If people think that only showing the RADICAL conservative opinion on climate change is going to make people take this site seriously, they're definitely wrong. -Cybersaur

PS: I am in no way trying to defend global warming ideology. I too think it is ridiculous.

Can someone add a section on the Marcott reconstruction, including his statement that it "cannot be considered representative of global temperature changes"?

And has anyone else besides me noticed that this admission contradicts the NY Times analysis? --Ed Poor Talk 13:38, 7 April 2013 (EDT)

I would just like to show you these two. I don't know about you, but these seem pretty accurate.

Here. And here.

You can claim politics and yell libtard, but that wont help change those two.


View the original article here