Political cards are tactics used by liberals in politics, the media, and other adversarial settings in order to appeal to emotion or even prejudice rather than reason. The term is a metaphor for what happens in the card game of bridge, where one card can be played to "trump" (defeat) all other cards. Political cards are thus a form of thought-terminating cliché.
In contrast with most card games, however, a political card can be played at any time, no matter how irrational or irrelevant to the topic. Many liberal articles and commentaries consist of little more than playing one or more political cards.
A card is "played" when one side relies on a particular issue in order to gain an often-unjustified upper hand in the debate or controversy.
Liberals have had a difficult time playing a political card against the Tea Party Movement, due to its amorphous nature.
Political card Meaning Example Advantage Disadvantage allegations men are ignorant slobs and women need a protected status as a voting bloc within the Democratic Party. Lawrence Summers was driven from his presidency of Harvard for merely mentioning the possibility that women may not have as much aptitude for math as men. implies women are helpless unless they receive special treatment from the government Bringing race into a debate by suggesting that criticism is racially motivated or that one's opponent is racist Used effectively to silence criticism of Obama in 2008 prove you're not a racist is like saying, "when did you stop beating your wife?" Scare grandpa and grandma into thinking their government benefits will be cut off Under President Obama, Social Security for the first time in its history, has a negative cash flow and has been paying out more in benefits than the cash it demands from younger workers.[1] Slander your opponent for proposing solutions. Political and economic stagnation. Anything that highlights or is critical of the historical record of liberal governance. programmed response for liberal failures. Bringing country of origin into a debate by suggesting that criticism is motivated by a fear of foreigners (eg. Australians) Polite and responsible criticism of President Obama is deemed xenophobic.[3] At first seems to be an effective way to pose the opponent as racist. Ultimately fails when both debaters are of the same country or when the person making the original claim is from the country of the claim. Calling opponents of the homosexual agenda intolerant instead of focusing on the immorality of homosexuality. Used against Rick Santorum leading up to his defeat for reelection in 2006 African-Americans oppose the promotion of gay rights in greater numbers than the general population of the United States as a whole.[4] demonstrating inconsistencies in liberal ideology. the most despicable forms of liberal intolerance traditionally have been reserved for, and manifested in, the vile abuses heaped upon Black conservatives, Black Republicans, and Black Tea Party activists. in a democracy, the voice of opposition can always be labeled intolerant Used to support socialized medicine cite Ted Kennedy’s “dream”, the “the cause of my life”, “Senator Kennedy eloquently captured how our long-term care system is failing the American people when he said, too often, they have to give up the American Dream" [5] emotional appeal for passing legislation Only 26% of the population can relate to liberalism, the Kennedy card has zero effect on legislation. Used to imply a few Republicans, mostly RINOs, are "responsible." "During the health care battle, President Obama was unable to find a single Responsible Republican." [6] In 1990 President George H.W. Bush was hailed as a Responsible Republican for breaking his "read my lips" pledge. in typical MSM newspeak, anything right of center or not liberal. Polls show mainstream journalists are more liberal than the American public.[8] Attacking oil companies for their profits, even though oil companies create jobs and pay into the federal Treasury, and profits make up a reasonable portion of total revenue. Most people care about money and fairness. Seems hypocritical if the person using the strategy is wealthy (like most liberal politicians) or benefits from capitalism (like all Americans) millionaires and billionaires card President Obama said on June 29, 2011, "I'm proposing we get rid of tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires." [9] appeals to voters motivated by envy politicians that use it are dependent on campaign contributions from millionaires and billionaires. the one making the charge cannot explain facts. Hillary Clinton charged that her husband's behavior was the result of a "vast right-wing conspiracy". provides plausible reasons for the simple minded. contradictory evidence leads to more conspiracy theories. Accusing the opponent of having an irrational fear or hatred of homosexuals. Opposition to the radical redefinition of marriage as expressed in California's Proposition 8 was deemed homophobia.[10] Old stand-by in the arsenal of liberal slander attacks. Attempts to ostracize and criminalize an emotional disorder. Many if not most homophobes are gay. Accusing the opponent of having an irrational fear or hatred of Muslims Don't question behavior because an individual happens to be Muslim Scare people from speaking out or investigating Look foolish making excuses for a religion publicly committed to the downfall of the West. apparently there is a ready market for hyperbole and fear among leftists. Ignores the fact the Reagan reforms gave birth to the longest, most extended era of peacetime prosperity in U.S. history.[12] equates moderates with ignorant fascists. A claim that tries to portray the opponent badly by placing them as someone who "hates the environment". The simple-minded will swallow any line of garbage. failure to behave in a realistic manner and being afraid to upset people Plays on others' fear of seeming weak. Because a person is stupid, they are unqualified to be president. Reading from a prop, Dan Quayle once misspelled "potato", and liberals destroyed him by playing this card. A momentary lapse is seized upon to make a person look like an idiot. Works well until a liberal candidate utters a statement like the United States is made up of 57 states. seeks to link Islamic fundamentalism with Christian fundamentalism. appeals to the fears of atheists and religious bigots. cry "free speech," "free speech" for everything offensive to Christianity, while censoring the truth and limiting political speech Supreme Court ruled exotic dancing protected free expression but disallowed a high school football team's pregame prayer under the same grounds. Legally it is technically correct Just because something is "free speech" does not mean it is not wrong Creationism is an emotive issue for many people on either side of the debate, so this can be a clever way to side-track sensible argument. claims those asking unanswered questions are conspiracy kooks Truthers vs. Birthers: Not All Conspiracy Theories Are Created Equal [16] Senator Ted Kennedy implied that Justice Bork would turn back Roe V. Wade forcing women to have back-alley abortions. fear Republican laws and personal responsibility you can't run from your conscience and consequence of actions can lead to a lifetime of suffering mocking a conservative opponent rather than dealing with substantive issues Using snarky (sometimes even offensive) humor to attack the opponent. Rachael Maddow, Jon Stewart, etc. Often a cue for other liberals to "join in" the laughter Nobody else is laughing (or they are laughing at the snark attempt-er). Claiming "What would Jesus do" to try to paint the opponent as not a true Christian (a common liberal tactic when cornered on a religious issue, such as homosexuality) As noted above, liberals often use this to defend homosexuality [17] by claiming that Jesus never specifically mentioned it. A true Christian can easily find the flaws in such an argument by pointing our how it is taken out of context. slurs anyone who wants to take away defensive weapons The shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was blamed on Sarah Palin; opponents of Constitutional Rights immediately clamored for bigger and more government oppression.[18] Appeals to pro-gun-control people's negative stereotypes of gun enthusiasts. changing the definition of a word to suit one's purposes An insidious way to reframe debate that can be effective if one's opponents are not vigilant or use imprecise thinking. Liberals often use certain "trends" to support their claims. Citing the Clinton surplus vs the Bush deficit At first makes the user look like they have done their research Often taken out of context (for example the Clinton surplus was largely due to a Republican congress and the end of the Cold War, while the Bush deficit was caused greatly by two wars and need for Homeland Security. selectively picking out cases that support one's arguments from a wide variety of material and ignoring all the cases that don't Many people struggle with statistics, so poorly-informed observers may assume the user is correct. dishonest and easy to point out counterexamples never-admit-a-mistake card [20] Obama said his stimulus would hold unemployment below 8%; instead it rose to over 9% and straddled the U.S. with the debt ceiling crisis. [21] incrementalism leads to compromise Denying American exceptionalism. Trots out false examples of how European countries have better standard of living. Lies or distorts truth in order to win argument. Can impress ill-informed or credulous observers. You're only fooling yourself if you believe any of it. Impersonation of Conservatives to discredit their positions. Liberals often create straw men during this impersonation. Adds to negative stereotypes of real conservatives, especially where people have not met many genuine conservatives. claiming that a policy benefits the rich and powerful Appeals to people's "Robin Hood" impulse to support underdogs and mistrust the wealthy. arguing someone must be right because he has more compassion Attempts to paint opponents' pragmatism as cold-heartedness. claiming some inconsistency in positions The idea that a pro-lifer must oppose death penalty Often the people making the Hypocrite claim exhibit hypocrisy themselves (see Liberal hypocrisy) insinuating that someone is bad because he was once in the same room with some extremist look who's calling the kettle back. Many people still have trouble with new media and struggle to draw correct conclusions from search results. None that are currently known. Postures Democrats as advocates for people who hold jobs and have children. Politicians who employ such rhetoric invariably work to pass legislation that destroys jobs and undermines families. the idea people born in a given country are xenophobic exclusionary bigots. Opposition to the Ground Zero mosque. divides the people against themselves Liberal George Soros likened the Bush administration to the Nazi regime. appeals to emotion and extremists, and less educated leftists. Seeks to paint loyal Americans as racist. "patriotism is little more than a disguised form of racism"[23] Some "Patriot movement" groups call for tighter immigration control. Democrats can be sensitive to the charge of being unpatriotic. Implies Democrats are sympathetic to a person's immigration status, despite the fact there is no historical record of legislative achievements in this area and Democrats associate being opposed to illegal immigration as being "anti-immigration" as a whole, which is bigoted and completely insulting to people that come to this country legally. The Obama Dream Act, a "cynical exercise in political charades", failed to pass the Democratic controlled Senate, 55-41. Seeks to pit voters against each other along racial and ethnic lines, which Democrats view as a win. Nixon's Southern Strategy card implies Richard Nixon appealed to Southern Democrats and racists after Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. "probably the biggest lie that's been told to the blacks since Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government" [24] ignores the fact that (1) Richard Nixon did not carry the South; a Democrat, George Wallace received 49 electoral votes exclusively from the South; and (2) passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was entirely dependent on Republican votes with Democrats in both houses voting against passage.[25] On the 150th anniversary of start of the Civil War, MSNBC's liberal hosts never missed an opportunity to associate today's conservative movement with the Confederacy, secession, slavery and racism.[26] implication rural inhabitants are uneducated and possibly racist Used to smear most conservatives pejorative aimed at Bluedog Democrats, Red State dwellers, and others in flyover country. When motivated, this group forms an important part of a center-right majority. bitter and cling to guns or religion card Why don't common people vote Democrat? Attempts to justify Democrat's failure to coffeehouse liberals, and persuade hick voters by belittling them. insinuates NASCAR fans are uneducated and racist NASCAR fans tend to vote Republican,[27] more so than fans of most others sports. Republicans failed to balance the budget by cutting $7.4 million from the Pentagon's sponsorship of NASCAR for Army recruiting. [28] NASCAR has an estimated 75 million fans. a former Miss California was stripped of her crown for saying she thought marriage was between a man and a woman. [29] ostracizing others among the unenlightened masses leads to feelings of superiority. not everyone keeps up to date on the lastest liberal tripe. accuse someone of being like the (false) liberal portrayal of Joseph McCarthy "Racist!" as an Epithet of Repression [30] baseless smear, such as calling someone a racist. Extremely flexible, and with great glee you can ruin someone's life just for fun. Requires no morals or conscience. Pretending to be a victim of the right wingers. Liberals looking for alleged conservative bias everywhere. Makes them look weak, petty and paranoid. Make religious and social conservatives appear to be irrational "Bible-thumpers" who follow the Holy Bible nonsensically. Liberal Hollywood degrading conservative preachers in movies such as Jesus Camp and Religulous. Alienates leaders of religious movements from the average person. Creates straw men out of real conservatives, which ultimately backfires as stereotypes are dispelled. ? http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/03/15/6273181-obama-agenda-social-security-still-the-third-rail? http://spectator.org/archives/2009/10/20/fcc-church-conspiracy-to-silen/print#? See:JournoList? http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2008/10/30/proposition_8? Dems invoke the ‘Kennedy Card’ to defend Obamacare in wake of failing CLASS Act, Daily Caller, October 26, 2011? http://www.slate.com/id/2251101/? Ibid.? The Liberal Media, Every Poll Shows Journalists Are More Liberal than the American Public — And the Public Knows It, Rich Noyes, Director of Research, Media Research Center, June 30, 2004.? The Washington Post Fact Checker column said, "in the context of a $4 trillion goal, it is essentially meaningless. The item is so small the White House could not even provide an estimate of the revenue that would be raised, but other estimates suggest it would amount to $3 billion over 10 years."? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/26/AR2010082605233.html? Paul Krugman Says GOP 'Zombies' Are Going to Eat Obama's Brain, Newsbusters.? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574344230339019304.html? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-roberts/global-warming-and-the-ho_b_74210.html? http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/02/on_comparing_global_warming_de.html? http://www.uncoverage.net/2011/03/new-tv-ad-for-epa-republicans-poison-babies/? Truthers vs. Birthers: Not All Conspiracy Theories Are Created Equal; Birthers aren't remotely as crazy — and dangerous — as Truthers. September 23, 2009 by Arthur Chrenkoff. Pajama's Media.? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-shore/what-would-jesus-do-if-in_b_480013.html? http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-01-09/news/27086902_1_gun-ban-sarah-palin-gun-incident? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124451592762396883.html? Thomas Sowell writes, (a) goals are redefined after the fact to give the public the illusion of success; (b) bad motives are ascribed to the opposition or society in general; (c) good intentions of the anointed are highlighted; and (d) they attack the accuracy of the data showing failure. Thomas Sowell, The Vision of the Anointed, Chap. 2.? http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2011/07/20/opinion/only-hope-is-undoing-obamas-mess.html Only Hope Is Undoing Obama’s Mess], Kenneth Brown And Micha Gisser, Albuquerque Journal, July 20 2011.? Google Search Results.? http://atheism.about.com/od/politicspoliticalissues/a/problempride_2.htm? Nixon's Southern Strategy: The Democrat-Lie Keeping Their Control Over the Black Community, Ken Raymond, June 6, 2011. associatedcontent from Yahoo.? Final tally in the House among Republicans was 138 to 34; Democrats 152-96; in the Senate 21 Democrats voted against passage while only 6 Republicans opposed. [1]? http://www.mrc.org/cmi/eyeonculture/2011/_MSNBCs_UnCivil_War_on_the_Right.html? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/04/24/109269/-Why-do-NASCAR-Fans-Vote-Republican? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/19/sports/autoracing/19nascar.html? http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2009/04/20/carrie-prejean-says-answer-gay-marriage-question-cost-miss-usa-crown/? “Racist!” as an Epithet of Repression, Dr. Paul Trout, Montana Professor Journal, Fall 1995.
0 comments:
Post a Comment