Showing posts with label Greater. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greater. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

National Security Brief: Top Senate Democrat Wants Greater U.S. Role In Syria


Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) said on Monday that the United States should play a more active role in bringing about Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s downfall. “I would go further than the President,” Levin said, adding that President Obama should consider establishing so-called “safe zones” for Syrian rebels within the country. Levin also said the U.S. should consider taking out the Syrian military’s anti-aircraft batteries and other Syrian Air Force assets.

Meanwhile, House Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) introduced legislation on Monday giving Obama that authority to provide “lethal equipment” to Syrian rebels fighting Assad’s forces. In a statement, Engel said the U.S. is “long past due to arm friendly rebels and turn the tide to allow for a more hopeful Syrian future.”

While U.S. officials mull whether and how much to intervene in Syria, the Syrian opposition coalition elected a Syrian born U.S. citizen to be the first prime minister of an interim government there should Assad fall. The group chose Ghassan Hitto, an information technology executive who lived in Texas until recently.

In other news:

Former Pentagon top counsel Jeh Johnson criticized the idea of any secret court to oversee the Obama administration’s targeted killing program, saying it would simply act as a “rubber stamp” for anything the executive wants to do. Johnson said that instead, the program should be brought within the auspices of the Defense Department in order to ensure its legality.
The AP reports: A hunger strike at the Guantánamo Bay prison has grown and now involves at least 21 men, a U.S. military official said Monday while denying reports trickling out from prisoners through lawyers that there is a more widespread protest and lives are in danger.
The Washington Post reports: Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has ordered the Pentagon to reconsider a sweeping military strategy that the Obama administration unveiled just last year to determine whether it is still affordable in light of recent budget cuts.

View the original article here

Sunday, May 19, 2013

PDL BioPharma forecasts greater 1Q royalties

INCLINE VILLAGE, Nev. -- PDL BioPharma Inc. said Monday that it expects about $92 million in royalty payments during the first quarter. That's more than analysts expected.

The company said its royalty revenue will grow about 19 percent compared to the first quarter of 2012. The increase comes from higher payments from the cancer drugs Avastin and Herceptin, eye drug Lucentis, and multiple sclerosis drug Tysabri. PDL helped develop those drugs and gets royalty payments based on sales in the previous quarter.

Analysts expect PDL to report $86 million in revenue, according to FactSet.

Avastin, Herceptin, and Lucentis are sold by Swiss drugmaker Roche. Biogen Idec Inc. sells Tysabri. PDL said Herceptin sales grew 11 percent and Avastin sales rose 10 percent compared to a year ago, but Roche is making and selling more of the drugs overseas than it has before. That gives PDL smaller royalty payments. The company said Tysabri sales rose 16 percent and Lucentis sales increased 12 percent.

PDL BioPharma lost 18 cents, or 2.6 percent, to $6.88 in morning trading.


View the original article here

Monday, March 4, 2013

Achieving greater transparency in government

Four years ago, the coalition I lead welcomed President Obama’s pledge to hold himself and his administration to a new standard of openness. Today, I urge the president to implement early in his second term an agenda that advances that promised transparency. Openness needs to be the default position for the federal government.

The administration has made progress toward proactively releasing more information online, including on such sites as data.gov, recovery.gov and USAspending.gov. But more yet can be done toward achieving transparency. In the spirit of helping reach that objective, I offer some suggestions developed by openness and accountability groups.

To ensure that the actions of federal agencies in complying with the Freedom of Information Act match the mandated "presumption in favor of disclosure," the Justice Department’s litigation strategy must reflect that mandate. We also recommend a deadline for agencies to update Freedom of Information Act regulations, with a focus on making it easier to obtain information. Also, agencies should be pushed to join the multiagency shared service, FOIAonline. FOIA needs to become a vehicle of last resort, not the first, by requiring federal agencies to post information that helps the public better hold them accountable.

The administration has taken steps toward bringing transparency to federal spending. But the Government Accountability and Transparency Board must put new emphasis on transparency. A plan is needed to increase data quality on USAspending.gov, and to make it possible for other databases, such as those about tax compliance, to be linked to spending information through a publicly available identifier. New tools need to be developed to allow recipients of federal funds to create electronic reports that can be used to show how those funds flow.
Numerous congressional committees, commissions and advisory groups have identified the problem of government’s predisposition toward secrecy under the guise of national security. Also undermining the legacy of openness is increased reliance on secrecy in judicial matters, including the too-frequent invocation of state secrets. The Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB) identified the need for presidential leadership to break through bureaucratic stasis in reforming the United States’ classification system. As a first step in eliminating overuse and misuse of secrecy, we urge the president to set up the PIDB-recommended White House-led Security Classification Steering Committee.

Protections for “whistleblowers” have led to new laws and an executive order. That’s good; whistleblowers make our government more effective and accountable to taxpayers. Now it’s important that intelligence agencies meaningfully implement that order and make it clear to government managers and supervisors that there is a zero-tolerance policy for suppression and retaliation.
An additional directive to criminal justice leaders discouraging overreaching prosecutions and prosecutorial threats also would be appropriate.
I’d be derelict if I failed to express the concerns of many openness advocates regarding trends in the character of signing statements. President Obama denounced them as a member of the U.S. Senate and as presidential candidate. Yet in his recent signing statement on the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013, he appeared to offer the same type of vexing rationalizations he once condemned -- he asserted the authority to “supervise, control, and correct employees’ communications with Congress in cases where such communications would … reveal information that is properly privileged or otherwise confidential.” The balance of powers was part of our founders’ purposeful manner of keeping the government responsible to the people. We believe respecting the limits of each branch’s powers and full transparency in the exercise of government are the best tools for openness and accountability.

Public engagement in the administration’s signature openness initiative, the multinational Open Government Partnership, needs to be reinvigorated. Let’s set an example for all countries participating in the partnership by engaging civil society broadly in developing the next U.S. plan and by making it ambitious in its commitments toward true transparency.

I and my colleagues thank President Obama for his efforts to establish an open and accountable government. By recommitting his administration to these efforts and pushing forward a strong open-government agenda, he would make significant strides toward achieving that openness,
McDermott is executive director of OpenTheGovernment.org, and author of “Who Needs to Know? The State of Public Access to Federal Government Information.”

View Comments

View the original article here

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Murdered Woman’s Family Sues For Greater Online Gun Control

Jitka Vesel

On December 12, 2012, the family of shooting victim Jitka Vesel sued the online gun market Armslist.com for the wrongful death of their loved one, who had been shot about 12 times in a parking lot in Illinois, by a gunman who had illegally obtained his weapon on the website.

Vesel’s brother hopes that lawmakers — like those named to the President’s gun violence prevention task force, created in the wake of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary — will address illegal online gun sales as they talk about measures to curb gun killings. Armslist does not require its buyers or sellers to give identification, and is not legally required to administer background checks:

“Armslist matches buyers and sellers solely based on Armslist’s mandatory drop-down menus that steer illegal buyers to illegal sellers,” Vesely said. “Armslist’s development of content thus materially contributes to the illegality of the gun sales it promotes.”

Jitka Vesel, 36, was shot 11 to 12 times by Smirnov in the parking lot of the Czechoslovak Heritage Museum in Oak Brook, Illinois, a Chicago suburb. Smirnov, a Canadian resident, had stalked her after she rebuffed his romantic overtures, according to Vesely. Smirnov, now serving a life prison sentence without parole, paid an extra $200 for the gun that had been listed for $400 because he couldn’t buy it legally, according to the complaint.

Background checks have indeed been part of the post-Newtown conversation about needed gun control measures; the President’s spokesperson floated the idea of closing the so-called ‘gun show loophole,’ which allows private sellers to distribute firearms without any checks on the purchaser. The Brady Campaign has found that, in some studies, “63 percent of private sellers sold guns to purchasers who stated they probably could not pass a background check.” Few lawmakers have addressed the idea of online black markets for gun sales, or websites like Armslist.com that do not have proper protections to ensure guns are not being sold to criminals.

Flawed federal laws also limit the ability of Vesel’s relatives to acquire evidence against Armslist in their civil suit. Several federal laws, known collectively as the Tiahrt Amendments, prevent trace data linking guns used in crime to previous owners and sellers from being used in civil proceedings.


View the original article here