Showing posts with label Thrones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thrones. Show all posts

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Does ‘Game of Thrones’ Need More Male Nudity?

My friend, New York Magazine television critic Matt Zoller Seitz has a novel solution to the complaint that Game of Thrones makes gratuitous use of female nudity: get the guys naked more often. He argues:

Since its 2011 debut, Thrones has been attacked for “gratuitous” nudity and labeled sexist for stripping its women more often than its men. These are two different complaints, though; intertwining them muddies each. The first concerns the appropriateness of graphic sex and/or nudity; the second is about the show’s “gaze,” which is undeniably heterosexual and male. But it’s possible to enjoy sex and nudity without guilt or bluenosed justifications while simultaneously pointing out that the scales of spectatorship are out of whack. I’d like Game of Thrones to enlarge the scope of its fantasy­ — to show more same-sex couplings and male nudity — as Starz’s Spartacus series has done with such panache. For all its tough, complicated women characters, Thrones is rightly perceived as too much of a ­sausagefest. The producers could change that perception by adding more sausage.

I think he’s on the right track, but has arrived at the wrong destination. What Game of Thrones needs isn’t more anatomy of any variety—and, as I’ll discuss at greater length in my full review of the season, which will be up on Friday, I think the show has actually absorbed that criticism in a productive way and is stronger for it. Instead, it needs more consensual sex, preferably in situations where one partner isn’t paying the other. At its best, Game of Thrones can be a terrific story about sexual violence in wartime. But for the full weight of that argument to be felt, and for sexual violence to register with the horror it’s meant to elicit—particularly given the troubling use of rape as a way to generate drama on prestige television without thought to larger context—we need to see the alternative, to see some of the happiness and normality that gets destroyed by war. It may be harder to depict good sex than the embarrassment of bad sex or the numbing fear of sexual violence. But that doesn’t mean it’s not worth trying, in part to remind those of us watching at home what kind of good world our friends in Westeros and beyond are fighting for.


View the original article here

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

‘Game of Thrones’ Returns Soon: What Are You Hoping For?

It’s felt a bit like we’ve been living through one of Westeros’s infamous winters, at least when it comes to the dwindling supply of good television, so I’m looking forward to the return of Game of Thrones like a Brother of the Night’s Watch awaiting a raven of the appropriate coloring from the Citadel:

There’s not much here to see yet—Tyrion’s scar is probably the biggest change this lets us see. I understand why it would have been prohibitive to really get rid of Peter Dinklage’s nose to match up the damage Tyrion suffers during the Battle of the Blackwater in the books, but I do regret the preservation of his general handsomeness. Readers of the books may share my feelings about how that will affect our perception of events coming down the pike. For both readers and people who are only watching the show, what are you looking forward to and hoping for in season three? As a member of the former category, I have to admit I’m looking forward to seeing how the show starts to diverge from the novels, if only because I think that some of the story lines that are being changed and trimmed will give us clues about what’s going to happen in George R.R. Martin’s yet-to-be-completed novels, and which plotlines are just red herrings, and thus, for the purposes of television, dispensable.


View the original article here