Friday, October 4, 2013

User talk:NKeaton

(Difference between revisions):Swordsman should not be allowed back in. It's not his editing of RW which I find problematic, it's his trashtalking of our admins at that website. He is a vandal. He is vandalizing our encyclopedia. He is a Hun, a Visigoth, a barbarian at the gate, clamoring for noble Roman blood. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 13:50, 17 June 2013 (EDT):Swordsman should not be allowed back in. It's not his editing of RW which I find problematic, it's his trashtalking of our admins at that website. He is a vandal. He is vandalizing our encyclopedia. He is a Hun, a Visigoth, a barbarian at the gate, clamoring for noble Roman blood. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 13:50, 17 June 2013 (EDT)::Oh my goodness. He's not a vandal. By your poor reasoning you should block me too. The admin here know how to take care of themselves. They don't need you to make up rules for them. When I get back from my fishing trip Ill find you TK's instruction to people with blocking rights to only block vandals. There were no spammers back then but theyre essentially vandalizing without any ill will. A hun! You're unintentionally funny. Life is a lot nicer when you don't get so worked up and single someone out my friend.  [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:41, 17 June 2013 (EDT)::Oh my goodness. He's not a vandal. By your poor reasoning you should block me too. The admin here know how to take care of themselves. They don't need you to make up rules for them. When I get back from my fishing trip Ill find you TK's instruction to people with blocking rights to only block vandals. There were no spammers back then but theyre essentially vandalizing without any ill will. A hun! You're unintentionally funny. Life is a lot nicer when you don't get so worked up and single someone out my friend.  [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:41, 17 June 2013 (EDT)Yeah, I was kind of inattentive when looking for a video to match the song. Sorry about that, after having my mistake shown to me I replaced it with a more appropriate video. As you'll see, the current video linked at the relevant article is completely non offensive. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 21:22, 23 June 2013 (EDT):The song is not pornographic, it's merely an objective description of the depravity of homosexual life. It seems to me that you're a homosexual agenda supporting liberal who wants to censor this kind of information. Beat on the brat is definitely not pornographic and you removed that as well. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 21:33, 23 June 2013 (EDT)

Nate, are you still around? If so then this is my friend. She did an amazing thing, accommpanied by a group of other wonderful people who were (and are) also survivors. Respect and love to you and yours and be strong. Davidspencer 10:02, 8 July 2012 (EDT) Hi David - things couldn't be better. My wife is 100% and we're all back at work. Thank you for your kind words and thoughts. Let me see if I can find your email address again. I have something funny to share with you I hope you will like. Nate 10:15, 4 August 2012 (EDT)

I am SO pleased for you that you have, in the midst of my emotion over the olympics, brought a tear to my eyes. As I have said to you before, you know my views on things like this but I have nothing but love for you people and respect for your strength. I hope you enjoy work and all the many many years I hope you all have together. All my love. Davidspencer 12:31, 12 August 2012 (EDT)

Sorry, only meant it to be a 2 hour warning block not a 2 week block! Sorry couldn't fix sooner as internet has been a bit patchy due to the flooding that we have experienced in Queensland over the past few days due to ex-tropical cyclone Oswald. Dvergne 09:49, 30 January 2013 (EST)

"You don't learn do you" isn't a warning and you have no business blocking someone having a discussion with the site owner of all people. Go bully someone else. Nate 11:00, 30 January 2013 (EST)

Actually to be entirely truthful, I have my reservations about monitoring RW for the express intent of banhammering everyone who edits there and here as well. On the other hand, Markman seems steadfast in his judgement -_- brenden 13:27, 17 June 2013 (EDT)

Swordsman should not be allowed back in. It's not his editing of RW which I find problematic, it's his trashtalking of our admins at that website. He is a vandal. He is vandalizing our encyclopedia. He is a Hun, a Visigoth, a barbarian at the gate, clamoring for noble Roman blood. - Markman 13:50, 17 June 2013 (EDT) Oh my goodness. He's not a vandal. By your poor reasoning you should block me too. The admin here know how to take care of themselves. They don't need you to make up rules for them. When I get back from my fishing trip Ill find you TK's instruction to people with blocking rights to only block vandals. There were no spammers back then but theyre essentially vandalizing without any ill will. A hun! You're unintentionally funny. Life is a lot nicer when you don't get so worked up and single someone out my friend. Nate 15:41, 17 June 2013 (EDT)

Yeah, I was kind of inattentive when looking for a video to match the song. Sorry about that, after having my mistake shown to me I replaced it with a more appropriate video. As you'll see, the current video linked at the relevant article is completely non offensive. - Markman 21:22, 23 June 2013 (EDT)

The song is not pornographic, it's merely an objective description of the depravity of homosexual life. It seems to me that you're a homosexual agenda supporting liberal who wants to censor this kind of information. Beat on the brat is definitely not pornographic and you removed that as well. - Markman 21:33, 23 June 2013 (EDT)

View the original article here

0 comments:

Post a Comment